Affiliations
AffiliationsItem in Clipboard
Findings in the distal colorectum are not associated with proximal advanced serrated lesionsCharles J Kahi et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Feb.
Free article doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.07.044. Epub 2014 Jul 30. AffiliationsItem in Clipboard
AbstractBackground & aims: Serrated lesions are an important contributor to colorectal cancer (CRC), notably in the proximal colon. Findings in the distal colorectum are markers of advanced proximal adenomatous neoplasia. However, it is not known whether they affect the odds of advanced proximal serrated lesions.
Methods: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of data from 1910 patients (59.3 ± 8.0 years, 53.8% female) who underwent an average-risk screening colonoscopy from August 2005 through April 2012 at Indiana University Hospital and an associated ambulatory surgery center. Colonoscopies were performed by an endoscopist with high rates of detection of adenomas and serrated polyps. Tissue samples of all serrated polyps (hyperplastic, sessile serrated adenoma/polyp [SSA/P], or traditional serrated adenoma) proximal to the sigmoid colon and serrated polyps >5 mm in the rectum or sigmoid colon were reviewed by a gastrointestinal pathologist and reclassified on the basis of World Health Organization criteria. Advanced serrated lesion (ASL) was defined as SSA/P with cytologic dysplasia, SSA/P ≥10 mm, or traditional serrated adenoma. Advanced conventional adenomatous neoplasia (ACN) was defined as tubular adenoma ≥10 mm, villous histology, high-grade dysplasia, or cancer. The prevalence of proximal ASL and ACN was calculated on the basis of distal colorectal findings. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the age-adjusted and sex-adjusted odds of advanced proximal adenomatous and serrated lesions. Secondary analyses were performed to examine the effect of variable ASL definitions.
Results: Fifty-two patients (2.7%) had proximal ASL, and 99 (5.2%) had proximal ACN. Of the 52 patients with proximal ASL, 27 (52%) had no distal polyps. Of the 99 patients with proximal ACN, 40 (40%) had no distal polyps. Age and type of distal adenomas were significantly associated with proximal ACN. There were no significant associations between distal polyp type and proximal ASL. In secondary analyses, distal SSA/Ps (P = .008) but not distal hyperplastic polyps or conventional adenomas were associated with any proximal SSA/P.
Conclusions: The findings at flexible sigmoidoscopy that traditionally serve as indications for colonoscopy (conventional adenomas) are likely to be ineffective for detection of proximal ASL. This finding, plus the observation that most patients with proximal ASL have no distal polyps, favors screening colonoscopy over sigmoidoscopy, especially in the elderly. The observation that non-advanced distal SSA/Ps are associated with any proximal SSA/P warrants further study.
Keywords: Colonoscopy; Colorectal Neoplasms; Early Detection; Sigmoidoscopy.
Copyright © 2015 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articlesHazewinkel Y, de Wijkerslooth TR, Stoop EM, Bossuyt PM, Biermann K, van de Vijver MJ, Fockens P, van Leerdam ME, Kuipers EJ, Dekker E. Hazewinkel Y, et al. Endoscopy. 2014 Mar;46(3):219-24. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1358800. Epub 2013 Nov 19. Endoscopy. 2014. PMID: 24254386
Álvarez C, Andreu M, Castells A, Quintero E, Bujanda L, Cubiella J, Salas D, Lanas Á, Carballo F, Morillas JD, Hernández C, Jover R, Sarasqueta C, Enriquéz-Navascués JM, Hernández V, Estévez P, Macenlle R, Sala T, Balaguer F, Pellisé M, Moreira L, Gil I, Peris A, González-Rubio F, Ferrández A, Poves C, Ponce M, Grau J, Serradesanferm A, Ono A, Cruzado J, Pérez-Riquelme F, Alonso-Abreu I, Carrillo-Palau M, Santander C, Díaz Tasende J, Herreros A, Cacho G, Barranco LE, Bessa X; ColonPrev study investigators. Álvarez C, et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Aug;78(2):333-341.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.03.003. Epub 2013 Apr 25. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013. PMID: 23623039 Clinical Trial.
Abdeljawad K, Vemulapalli KC, Kahi CJ, Cummings OW, Snover DC, Rex DK. Abdeljawad K, et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):517-24. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.04.064. Epub 2014 Jul 3. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015. PMID: 24998465
Farraye FA, Wallace M. Farraye FA, et al. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2002 Jan;12(1):41-51. doi: 10.1016/s1052-5157(03)00056-4. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2002. PMID: 11916160 Review.
Murakami T, Sakamoto N, Nagahara A. Murakami T, et al. World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Aug 7;24(29):3250-3259. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i29.3250. World J Gastroenterol. 2018. PMID: 30090005 Free PMC article. Review.
O'Connell BM, Crockett SD. O'Connell BM, et al. Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Feb 22;9:113-125. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S106257. eCollection 2017. Clin Epidemiol. 2017. PMID: 28260946 Free PMC article. Review.
Wang ZJ, Luo C, Zhao LL, Li SY, Fu HY, Su XJ, Li ZS. Wang ZJ, et al. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2023 Feb;34(2):101-107. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2022.22027. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2023. PMID: 36445054 Free PMC article.
Oliveira PSP, Carvalho RB, Magro DO, Camargo MG, Martinez CAR, Coy CSR. Oliveira PSP, et al. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2018 Oct 21;2018:5946057. doi: 10.1155/2018/5946057. eCollection 2018. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2018. PMID: 30420877 Free PMC article.
Papastergiou V, Mathou N, Giannakopoulos A, Evgenidi A, Schoretsanitis E, Papaparaskeva K, Apessou D, Paraskeva KD. Papastergiou V, et al. Ann Gastroenterol. 2020 Mar-Apr;33(2):187-194. doi: 10.20524/aog.2020.0458. Epub 2020 Feb 12. Ann Gastroenterol. 2020. PMID: 32127740 Free PMC article.
Kahi CJ. Kahi CJ. Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Mar;60(3):773-80. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3449-z. Epub 2015 Jan 4. Dig Dis Sci. 2015. PMID: 25556584 Review.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3