Affiliations
AffiliationItem in Clipboard
Daily collection of self-reporting sleep disturbance data via a smartphone app in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a feasibility studyYul Ha Min et al. J Med Internet Res. 2014.
. 2014 May 23;16(5):e135. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3421. Authors Yul Ha Min 1 , Jong Won Lee, Yong-Wook Shin, Min-Woo Jo, Guiyun Sohn, Jae-Ho Lee, Guna Lee, Kyung Hae Jung, Joohon Sung, Beom Seok Ko, Jong-Han Yu, Hee Jeong Kim, Byung Ho Son, Sei Hyun Ahn AffiliationItem in Clipboard
AbstractBackground: Improvements in mobile telecommunication technologies have enabled clinicians to collect patient-reported outcome (PRO) data more frequently, but there is as yet limited evidence regarding the frequency with which PRO data can be collected via smartphone applications (apps) in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.
Objective: The primary objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of an app for sleep disturbance-related data collection from breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. A secondary objective was to identify the variables associated with better compliance in order to identify the optimal subgroups to include in future studies of smartphone-based interventions.
Methods: Between March 2013 and July 2013, patients who planned to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer at Asan Medical Center who had access to a smartphone app were enrolled just before the start of their chemotherapy and asked to self-report their sleep patterns, anxiety severity, and mood status via a smartphone app on a daily basis during the 90-day study period. Push notifications were sent to participants daily at 9 am and 7 pm. Data regarding the patients' demographics, interval from enrollment to first self-report, baseline Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI) score, and health-related quality of life score (as assessed using the EuroQol Five Dimensional [EQ5D-3L] questionnaire) were collected to ascertain the factors associated with compliance with the self-reporting process.
Results: A total of 30 participants (mean age 45 years, SD 6; range 35-65 years) were analyzed in this study. In total, 2700 daily push notifications were sent to these 30 participants over the 90-day study period via their smartphones, resulting in the collection of 1215 self-reporting sleep-disturbance data items (overall compliance rate=45.0%, 1215/2700). The median value of individual patient-level reporting rates was 41.1% (range 6.7-95.6%). The longitudinal day-level compliance curve fell to 50.0% at day 34 and reached a nadir of 13.3% at day 90. The cumulative longitudinal compliance curve exhibited a steady decrease by about 50% at day 70 and continued to fall to 45% on day 90. Women without any form of employment exhibited the higher compliance rate. There was no association between any of the other patient characteristics (ie, demographics, and BDI and EQ5D-3L scores) and compliance. The mean individual patient-level reporting rate was higher for the subgroup with a 1-day lag time, defined as starting to self-report on the day immediately after enrollment, than for those with a lag of 2 or more days (51.6%, SD 24.0 and 29.6%, SD 25.3, respectively; P=.03).
Conclusions: The 90-day longitudinal collection of daily self-reporting sleep-disturbance data via a smartphone app was found to be feasible. Further research should focus on how to sustain compliance with this self-reporting for a longer time and select subpopulations with higher rates of compliance for mobile health care.
Keywords: breast cancer; compliance; mobile applications; self report.
Conflict of interest statementConflicts of Interest: None declared.
FiguresFigure 1
Study design and participant flow.
Figure 1
Study design and participant flow.
Figure 1Study design and participant flow.
Figure 2
Screenshot of the app for…
Figure 2
Screenshot of the app for self-reporting of sleep disturbance data.
Figure 2Screenshot of the app for self-reporting of sleep disturbance data.
Figure 3
Distribution of individual patient-level reporting…
Figure 3
Distribution of individual patient-level reporting rates.
Figure 3Distribution of individual patient-level reporting rates.
Figure 4
Changes in compliance over time.
Figure 4
Changes in compliance over time.
Figure 4Changes in compliance over time.
Figure 5
Intervals from enrollment to first…
Figure 5
Intervals from enrollment to first self-reporting. X and O indicate day of enrollment…
Figure 5Intervals from enrollment to first self-reporting. X and O indicate day of enrollment and day of start of self-reporting, respectively.
Figure 6
Comparison of longitudinal compliance rates…
Figure 6
Comparison of longitudinal compliance rates according to different time units.
Figure 6Comparison of longitudinal compliance rates according to different time units.
Figure 7
Push notifications and distribution of…
Figure 7
Push notifications and distribution of self-reporting time.
Figure 7Push notifications and distribution of self-reporting time.
Similar articlesKim HJ, Kim SM, Shin H, Jang JS, Kim YI, Han DH. Kim HJ, et al. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Oct 29;20(10):e273. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9559. J Med Internet Res. 2018. PMID: 30578205 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Buergy D, Siefert V, Neumaier C, Ganslandt T, Sperk E, Blessing M, Hesser J, Welzel G, Wenz F, Giordano FA. Buergy D, et al. Strahlenther Onkol. 2020 Mar;196(3):205-212. doi: 10.1007/s00066-019-01548-0. Epub 2019 Nov 18. Strahlenther Onkol. 2020. PMID: 31740981 Clinical Trial. English.
Kim J, Lim S, Min YH, Shin YW, Lee B, Sohn G, Jung KH, Lee JH, Son BH, Ahn SH, Shin SY, Lee JW. Kim J, et al. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Aug 4;18(8):e216. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5598. J Med Internet Res. 2016. PMID: 27492880 Free PMC article.
Aledavood T, Torous J, Triana Hoyos AM, Naslund JA, Onnela JP, Keshavan M. Aledavood T, et al. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019 Jun 4;21(7):49. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1043-y. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019. PMID: 31161412 Free PMC article. Review.
Marcano Belisario JS, Huckvale K, Greenfield G, Car J, Gunn LH. Marcano Belisario JS, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 27;2013(11):CD010013. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010013.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 24282112 Free PMC article. Review.
Stieger S, Götz FM, Gehrig F. Stieger S, et al. Front Psychol. 2015 May 12;6:497. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00497. eCollection 2015. Front Psychol. 2015. PMID: 26029124 Free PMC article.
Davoodi S, Mohammadzadeh Z, Safdari R. Davoodi S, et al. Acta Inform Med. 2016 Jun;24(3):193-6. doi: 10.5455/aim.2016.24.193-196. Epub 2016 Jun 4. Acta Inform Med. 2016. PMID: 27482134 Free PMC article.
Jakob R, Harperink S, Rudolf AM, Fleisch E, Haug S, Mair JL, Salamanca-Sanabria A, Kowatsch T. Jakob R, et al. J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 25;24(5):e35371. doi: 10.2196/35371. J Med Internet Res. 2022. PMID: 35612886 Free PMC article. Review.
Davis SW, Oakley-Girvan I. Davis SW, et al. J Cancer Surviv. 2017 Aug;11(4):498-504. doi: 10.1007/s11764-017-0608-1. Epub 2017 Mar 24. J Cancer Surviv. 2017. PMID: 28342093
Jamwal NR, Kumar SP. Jamwal NR, et al. Indian J Palliat Care. 2016 Jan-Mar;22(1):108-10. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.173950. Indian J Palliat Care. 2016. PMID: 26962291 Free PMC article.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3