Affiliations
AffiliationsItem in Clipboard
Endoscopic detection of proximal serrated lesions and pathologic identification of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps vary on the basis of centerShannon R Payne et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Jul.
. 2014 Jul;12(7):1119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.11.034. Epub 2013 Dec 10. AffiliationsItem in Clipboard
AbstractBackground & aims: We investigated rates of detection of proximal serrated lesions in a cohort of average-risk patients undergoing screening colonoscopies.
Methods: We reviewed results from screening colonoscopies performed by attending gastroenterologists at 32 endoscopy centers from 2008-2010. Pathology slides were interpreted at the individual centers. For this analysis, serrated lesions included hyperplastic polyps larger than 10 mm, those interpreted as sessile serrated adenomas (or sessile serrated polyp), and traditional serrated adenomas. Rates of detection for conventional adenomas and serrated lesions were compared among centers.
Results: A total of 5778 lesions were detected in 7215 screening colonoscopies. Of the 5548 lesions with pathology results, 3008 (54.2%) were conventional adenomas, 350 (6.3%) were serrated, and 232 (4.2%) were proximal serrated. The proportion of colonoscopies with at least 1 proximal serrated lesion was 2.8% (range among centers, 0%-9.8%). The number of serrated lesions per colonoscopy ranged from 0.00-0.11 (average, 0.05 ± 0.25). Overall lesion detection rates correlated with proximal serrated lesion detection rates (R = 0.91, P < .0001); conventional adenoma and proximal serrated lesion detection rates also correlated (R = .43, P = .025). The detection rate of proximal serrated lesions differed significantly among centers (P < .0001); odds ratios for detection ranged from 0-0.79. Some centers' pathologists never identified proximal serrated lesions as sessile serrated adenomas/polyps.
Conclusions: In an average-risk screening cohort, detection of proximal serrated lesions varied greatly among endoscopy centers. There was also substantial variation among pathologists in identification of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps. Nationally, a significant proportion of proximal serrated lesions may be missed during colonoscopy examination or incorrectly identified during pathology assessment. ClinicalTrials.gov Number: NCT00855348.
Keywords: Cancer Screening; Colon Cancer; Early Detection; Hyperplastic Polyp; Sessile Serrated Adenoma; Sessile Serrated Polyp.
Copyright © 2014 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articlesKahi CJ, Hewett DG, Norton DL, Eckert GJ, Rex DK. Kahi CJ, et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Jan;9(1):42-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.09.013. Epub 2010 Oct 1. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011. PMID: 20888435
Sanaka MR, Gohel T, Podugu A, Kiran RP, Thota PN, Lopez R, Church JM, Burke CA. Sanaka MR, et al. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Sep;57(9):1113-9. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000183. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014. PMID: 25101608
Kahi CJ, Vemulapalli KC, Snover DC, Abdel Jawad KH, Cummings OW, Rex DK. Kahi CJ, et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Feb;13(2):345-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.07.044. Epub 2014 Jul 30. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015. PMID: 25083562
Bordaçahar B, Barret M, Terris B, Dhooge M, Dreanic J, Prat F, Coriat R, Chaussade S. Bordaçahar B, et al. Dig Liver Dis. 2015 Feb;47(2):95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Oct 25. Dig Liver Dis. 2015. PMID: 25445408 Review.
Anderson JC, Srivastava A. Anderson JC, et al. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2020 Jul;30(3):457-478. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2020.02.007. Epub 2020 Apr 8. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2020. PMID: 32439082 Review.
Rex DK. Rex DK. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2014 Oct;10(10):671-4. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2014. PMID: 27540339 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Kim SY, Kwak MS, Yoon SM, Jung Y, Kim JW, Boo SJ, Oh EH, Jeon SR, Nam SJ, Park SY, Park SK, Chun J, Baek DH, Choi MY, Park S, Byeon JS, Kim HK, Cho JY, Lee MS, Lee OY; Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; Korean Society of Gastroenterology; Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases. Kim SY, et al. Clin Endosc. 2022 Nov;55(6):703-725. doi: 10.5946/ce.2022.136. Epub 2022 Oct 13. Clin Endosc. 2022. PMID: 36225130 Free PMC article. Review.
Vu NTH, Le HM, Vo DT, Vu HA, Le NQ, Ho DDQ, Quach DT. Vu NTH, et al. World J Clin Oncol. 2024 Feb 24;15(2):290-301. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v15.i2.290. World J Clin Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38455129 Free PMC article.
Chavali LB, Hu K, Sheth A, Gao N, Xiong W, Zhang L. Chavali LB, et al. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Feb;32(2):199-204. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001642. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020. PMID: 31851088 Free PMC article.
Ohki D, Tsuji Y, Shinozaki T, Sakaguchi Y, Minatsuki C, Kinoshita H, Niimi K, Ono S, Hayakawa Y, Yoshida S, Yamada A, Kodashima S, Yamamichi N, Hirata Y, Ushiku T, Fujishiro M, Fukayama M, Koike K. Ohki D, et al. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2018 Mar 15;10(3):82-90. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v10.i3.82. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29564038 Free PMC article.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3