Comparative Study
. 2014 Feb 8;383(9916):524-32. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62218-7. Epub 2013 Nov 3. Efficacy of HPV-based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer: follow-up of four European randomised controlled trials Joakim Dillner 2 , K Miriam Elfström 2 , Sara Tunesi 3 , Peter J F Snijders 4 , Marc Arbyn 5 , Henry Kitchener 6 , Nereo Segnan 7 , Clare Gilham 8 , Paolo Giorgi-Rossi 9 , Johannes Berkhof 4 , Julian Peto 8 , Chris J L M Meijer 4 ; International HPV screening working groupCollaborators, Affiliations
CollaboratorsItem in Clipboard
Comparative Study
Efficacy of HPV-based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer: follow-up of four European randomised controlled trialsGuglielmo Ronco et al. Lancet. 2014.
. 2014 Feb 8;383(9916):524-32. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62218-7. Epub 2013 Nov 3. Authors Guglielmo Ronco 1 , Joakim Dillner 2 , K Miriam Elfström 2 , Sara Tunesi 3 , Peter J F Snijders 4 , Marc Arbyn 5 , Henry Kitchener 6 , Nereo Segnan 7 , Clare Gilham 8 , Paolo Giorgi-Rossi 9 , Johannes Berkhof 4 , Julian Peto 8 , Chris J L M Meijer 4 ; International HPV screening working group CollaboratorsItem in Clipboard
Erratum in[No authors listed] [No authors listed] Lancet. 2015 Oct 10;386(10002):1446. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00411-0. Lancet. 2015. PMID: 26466047 No abstract available.
Background: In four randomised trials, human papillomavirus (HPV)-based screening for cervical cancer was compared with cytology-based cervical screening, and precursors of cancer were the endpoint in every trial. However, direct estimates are missing of the relative efficacy of HPV-based versus cytology-based screening for prevention of invasive cancer in women who undergo regular screening, of modifiers (eg, age) of this relative efficacy, and of the duration of protection. We did a follow-up study of the four randomised trials to investigate these outcomes.
Methods: 176,464 women aged 20-64 years were randomly assigned to HPV-based (experimental arm) or cytology-based (control arm) screening in Sweden (Swedescreen), the Netherlands (POBASCAM), England (ARTISTIC), and Italy (NTCC). We followed up these women for a median of 6·5 years (1,214,415 person-years) and identified 107 invasive cervical carcinomas by linkage with screening, pathology, and cancer registries, by masked review of histological specimens, or from reports. Cumulative and study-adjusted rate ratios (experimental vs control) were calculated for incidence of invasive cervical carcinoma.
Findings: The rate ratio for invasive cervical carcinoma among all women from recruitment to end of follow-up was 0·60 (95% CI 0·40-0·89), with no heterogeneity between studies (p=0·52). Detection of invasive cervical carcinoma was similar between screening methods during the first 2·5 years of follow-up (0·79, 0·46-1·36) but was significantly lower in the experimental arm thereafter (0·45, 0·25-0·81). In women with a negative screening test at entry, the rate ratio was 0·30 (0·15-0·60). The cumulative incidence of invasive cervical carcinoma in women with negative entry tests was 4·6 per 10(5) (1·1-12·1) and 8·7 per 10(5) (3·3-18·6) at 3·5 and 5·5 years, respectively, in the experimental arm, and 15·4 per 10(5) (7·9-27·0) and 36·0 per 10(5) (23·2-53·5), respectively, in the control arm. Rate ratios did not differ by cancer stage, but were lower for adenocarcinoma (0·31, 0·14-0·69) than for squamous-cell carcinoma (0·78, 0·49-1·25). The rate ratio was lowest in women aged 30-34 years (0·36, 0·14-0·94).
Interpretation: HPV-based screening provides 60-70% greater protection against invasive cervical carcinomas compared with cytology. Data of large-scale randomised trials support initiation of HPV-based screening from age 30 years and extension of screening intervals to at least 5 years.
Funding: European Union, Belgian Foundation Against Cancer, KCE-Centre d'Expertise, IARC, The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, the Italian Ministry of Health.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment inIsidean SD, Franco EL. Isidean SD, et al. Lancet. 2014 Feb 8;383(9916):493-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62028-0. Epub 2013 Nov 3. Lancet. 2014. PMID: 24192251 No abstract available.
Ruffin M. Ruffin M. Evid Based Med. 2014 Aug;19(4):148. doi: 10.1136/eb-2014-101792. Epub 2014 Apr 2. Evid Based Med. 2014. PMID: 24694516 No abstract available.
Sideri M, Igidbashian S. Sideri M, et al. Lancet. 2014 Apr 12;383(9925):1294. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60643-7. Lancet. 2014. PMID: 24725574 No abstract available.
Schneider A, Petry U, Erdemoglu E, Paavonen J. Schneider A, et al. Lancet. 2014 Apr 12;383(9925):1294-1295. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60644-9. Lancet. 2014. PMID: 24725575 No abstract available.
Ronco G, Meijer CJL, Segnan N, Kitchener H, Giorgi-Rossi P, Peto J, Dillner J. Ronco G, et al. Lancet. 2014 Apr 12;383(9925):1295. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60645-0. Lancet. 2014. PMID: 24725577 No abstract available.
Lata K, Bhatla N. Lata K, et al. Natl Med J India. 2014 Jul-Aug;27(4):212-3. Natl Med J India. 2014. PMID: 25668167 No abstract available.
C Kitchener H, Canfell K, Gilham C, Sargent A, Roberts C, Desai M, Peto J. C Kitchener H, et al. Health Technol Assess. 2014 Apr;18(23):1-196. doi: 10.3310/hta18230. Health Technol Assess. 2014. PMID: 24762804 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Ronco G, Biggeri A, Confortini M, Naldoni C, Segnan N, Sideri M, Zappa M, Zorzi M, Calvia M, Accetta G, Giordano L, Cogo C, Carozzi F, Gillio Tos A, Arbyn M, Mejier CJ, Snijders PJ, Cuzick J, Giorgi Rossi P. Ronco G, et al. Epidemiol Prev. 2012 May-Aug;36(3-4 Suppl 1):e1-72. Epidemiol Prev. 2012. PMID: 22828243 Italian.
Ronco G, Confortini M, Maccallini V, Naldoni C, Segnan N, Sideri M, Zappa M, Zorzi M, Calvia M, Giorgi Rossi P. Ronco G, et al. Epidemiol Prev. 2012 Sep-Oct;36(5 Suppl 2):e1-e33. Epidemiol Prev. 2012. PMID: 23139163 Review. Italian.
Gilham C, Sargent A, Kitchener HC, Peto J. Gilham C, et al. Health Technol Assess. 2019 Jun;23(28):1-44. doi: 10.3310/hta23280. Health Technol Assess. 2019. PMID: 31219027 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Koliopoulos G, Nyaga VN, Santesso N, Bryant A, Martin-Hirsch PP, Mustafa RA, Schünemann H, Paraskevaidis E, Arbyn M. Koliopoulos G, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 10;8(8):CD008587. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008587.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28796882 Free PMC article. Review.
Daponte A, Michail G, Daponte AI, Daponte N, Valasoulis G. Daponte A, et al. Cancers (Basel). 2021 Apr 1;13(7):1640. doi: 10.3390/cancers13071640. Cancers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33915878 Free PMC article. Review.
Xu H, Lin A, Shao X, Shi W, Zhang Y, Yan W. Xu H, et al. Oncotarget. 2016 Dec 13;7(50):83775-83783. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11959. Oncotarget. 2016. PMID: 27626178 Free PMC article.
Dhillon SK, Oštrbenk Valenčak A, Xu L, Poljak M, Arbyn M. Dhillon SK, et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2021 May 19;59(6):e00286-21. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00286-21. Print 2021 May 19. J Clin Microbiol. 2021. PMID: 33731413 Free PMC article.
Ibáñez R, Roura E, Monfil L, Rodríguez LA, Sardà M, Crespo N, Pascual A, Martí C, Fibla M, Gutiérrez C, Lloveras B, Oliveras G, Torrent A, Català I, Bosch FX, Bruni L, de Sanjosé S. Ibáñez R, et al. PLoS One. 2020 Aug 27;15(8):e0237988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237988. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32853216 Free PMC article.
Dang L, Kong L, Zhao Y, Dai Y, Ma L, Wei L, Zhang S, Liu J, Xi M, Chen L, Duan X, Xiao Q, Abulizi G, Zhang G, Hong Y, Zhou Q, Xie X, Li L, Niyazi M, Zhang Z, Tuo J, Ding Y, Qiao Y, Lang J. Dang L, et al. Chin J Cancer Res. 2022 Oct 30;34(5):496-509. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2022.05.09. Chin J Cancer Res. 2022. PMID: 36398123 Free PMC article.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3