Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24014153/ below:

Acceptability of telemedicine and other cancer genetic counseling models of service delivery in geographically remote settings

Affiliations

• ¹ MaineHealth, Portland, ME, 04101, USA.

• PMID: 24014153
• DOI: 10.1007/s10897-013-9652-9

Item in Clipboard

Eileen McDonald et al. J Genet Couns. 2014 Apr.

• ¹ MaineHealth, Portland, ME, 04101, USA.

• PMID: 24014153
• DOI: 10.1007/s10897-013-9652-9

Item in Clipboard

This work examined acceptability of cancer genetic counseling models of service delivery among Maine residents at risk for hereditary cancer susceptibility disorders. Pre-counseling, participants ranked characteristics reflecting models of care from most to least important including: mode-of-communication (in-person versus telegenetics), provider level of training (genetic specialty versus some training/experience), delivery format (one-on-one versus group counseling), and location (local versus tertiary service requiring travel). Associations between models of care characteristic rankings and patient characteristics, including rural residence, perceived cancer risk, and perceived risk for a hereditary cancer risk susceptibility disorder were examined. A total of 149/300 (49.7% response rate) individuals from 11/16 Maine counties responded; 30.8% were from rural counties; 92.2% indicated that an important/the most important model of care characteristic is provider professional qualifications. Among other characteristics, 65.1% ranked one-on-one counseling as important/the most important. In-person and local counseling were ranked the two least important characteristics (51.8% and 52.1% important/the most important, respectively). Responses did not vary by patient characteristics with the exception of greater acceptance of group counseling among those at perceived high personal cancer risk. Cancer telegenetic services hold promise for access to expert providers in a one-on-one format for rurally remote clients.

PubMed Disclaimer

• Utilizing Remote Real-Time Videoconferencing to Expand Access to Cancer Genetic Services in Community Practices: A Multicenter Feasibility Study.

  Bradbury A, Patrick-Miller L, Harris D, Stevens E, Egleston B, Smith K, Mueller R, Brandt A, Stopfer J, Rauch S, Forman A, Kim R, Fetzer D, Fleisher L, Daly M, Domchek S. Bradbury A, et al. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Feb 1;18(2):e23. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4564. J Med Internet Res. 2016. PMID: 26831751 Free PMC article.

• Patients' and professionals' perspective of non-in-person visits in hereditary cancer: predictors and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

  López-Fernández A, Villacampa G, Grau E, Salinas M, Darder E, Carrasco E, Torres-Esquius S, Iglesias S, Solanes A, Gadea N, Velasco A, Urgell G, Torres M, Tuset N, Brunet J, Corbella S, Balmaña J. López-Fernández A, et al. Genet Med. 2021 Aug;23(8):1450-1457. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01157-2. Epub 2021 Apr 6. Genet Med. 2021. PMID: 33824504 Free PMC article.

• Pediatric Oncologists' Experiences Returning and Incorporating Genomic Sequencing Results into Cancer Care.

  Hsu RL, Gutierrez AM, Schellhammer SK, Robinson JO, Scollon S, Street RL Jr, Salisbury AN, Pereira S, Plon SE, Malek J, Parsons DW, McGuire AL. Hsu RL, et al. J Pers Med. 2021 Jun 18;11(6):570. doi: 10.3390/jpm11060570. J Pers Med. 2021. PMID: 34207141 Free PMC article.

1. 1. BMC Infect Dis. 2011 Oct 25;11:285 - PubMed
2. 1. Conn Med. 2010 Aug;74(7):413-23 - PubMed
3. 1. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2009 Dec;13(6):735-41 - PubMed
4. 1. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012 Sep-Oct;25(5):625-34 - PubMed
5. 1. J Telemed Telecare. 2000;6(1):36-40 - PubMed

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.3