Affiliations
AffiliationItem in Clipboard
Gender differences in predictors of colorectal cancer screening uptake: a national cross sectional study based on the health belief modelReuben K Wong et al. BMC Public Health. 2013.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-677. AffiliationItem in Clipboard
AbstractBackground: Colorectal Cancer (CRC) is rapidly rising in Asia, but screening uptake remains poor. Although studies have reported gender differences in screening rates, there have been few studies assessing gender specific perceptions and barriers towards CRC screening, based on behavioral frameworks. We applied the Health Belief Model to identify gender-specific predictors of CRC screening in an Asian population.
Methods: A nationwide representative household survey was conducted on 2000 subjects aged 50 years and above in Singapore from 2007 to 2008. Screening behaviour, knowledge and beliefs on CRC screening were assessed by face-to-face structured interviews. The response rate was 88.2%.
Results: 26.7 percent had undergone current CRC screening with no gender difference in rates. Almost all agreed that CRC would lead to suffering (89.8%), death (84.6%) and would pose significant treatment cost and expense (83.1%). The majority (88.5%) agreed that screening aids early detection and cure but only 35.4% felt susceptible to CRC. Nearly three-quarters (74.3%) of the respondents recalled reading or hearing information on CRC in the print or broadcast media. However, only 22.6% were advised by their physicians to undergo screening. Significantly more women than men had feared a positive diagnosis, held embarrassment, pain and risk concerns about colonoscopy and had friends and family members who encouraged screening. On multivariate analysis, screening uptake showed a positive association with worry about contracting CRC and a physician's recommendation and a negative association with perceived pain about colonoscopy for both genders. For women only, screening was positively associated with having attended a public talk on CRC and having a family member with CRC, and was negatively associated with Malay race and perceived danger of colonoscopy.
Conclusions: CRC screening remains poor despite high levels of awareness of its benefits in this Asian population. Race, worry about contracting cancer, psychological barriers, and cues from the doctor and a public talk on CRC were associated with screening with gender specific differences. Strategies to increase CRC screening uptake should consider gender specific approaches to address psychological barriers and increase disease susceptibility through public health education and active promotion by physicians.
FiguresFigure 1
Survey Process Workflow. *The 20…
Figure 1
Survey Process Workflow. *The 20 non-contactables were assumed to be eligibles. Hence the…
Figure 1Survey Process Workflow. *The 20 non-contactables were assumed to be eligibles. Hence the response rate is 1763/2000 ie 88.2%.
Figure 2
CRC Screening uptake among males…
Figure 2
CRC Screening uptake among males and females.
Figure 2CRC Screening uptake among males and females.
Figure 3
Knowledge on presenting symptoms of…
Figure 3
Knowledge on presenting symptoms of colorectal cancer.
Figure 3Knowledge on presenting symptoms of colorectal cancer.
Similar articlesHuang Y, Soon YY, Ngo LP, Dina Ee YH, Tai BC, Wong HC, Lee SC. Huang Y, et al. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Jun 1;20(6):1817-1824. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.6.1817. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019. PMID: 31244305 Free PMC article.
Chong VH. Chong VH. World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul 21;18(27):3590-4. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i27.3590. World J Gastroenterol. 2012. PMID: 22826625 Free PMC article.
Almadi MA, Alghamdi F. Almadi MA, et al. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan-Feb;25(1):27-39. doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_455_18. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2019. PMID: 30618441 Free PMC article.
Kim C, Hofer TP, Kerr EA. Kim C, et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Oct;18(10):854-63. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20910.x. J Gen Intern Med. 2003. PMID: 14521649 Free PMC article. Review.
Gimeno Garcia AZ, Hernandez Alvarez Buylla N, Nicolas-Perez D, Quintero E. Gimeno Garcia AZ, et al. ISRN Oncol. 2014 Mar 5;2014:425787. doi: 10.1155/2014/425787. eCollection 2014. ISRN Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24729896 Free PMC article. Review.
Gomes FS, Kislaya I, Seabra D, Cordeiro E, Nunes B. Gomes FS, et al. Port J Public Health. 2021 Jun 18;39(1):48-57. doi: 10.1159/000516502. eCollection 2021 Jul. Port J Public Health. 2021. PMID: 39469035 Free PMC article.
Cossu G, Saba L, Minerba L, Mascalchi M. Cossu G, et al. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2018 Mar 21;14:63-69. doi: 10.2174/1745017901814010063. eCollection 2018. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2018. PMID: 29643929 Free PMC article. Review.
Lu J, Dong Y, Zhang X, Wang Y, Zhou Z. Lu J, et al. Prev Med Rep. 2024 Apr 12;41:102727. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102727. eCollection 2024 May. Prev Med Rep. 2024. PMID: 38633208 Free PMC article.
Hatamian S, Hadavandsiri F, Momenimovahed Z, Salehiniya H. Hatamian S, et al. Ecancermedicalscience. 2021 Sep 13;15:1285. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2021.1285. eCollection 2021. Ecancermedicalscience. 2021. PMID: 34824608 Free PMC article. Review.
Huang Q, Tan LY. Huang Q, et al. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 Mar 1;25(3):867-873. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.3.867. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024. PMID: 38546069 Free PMC article.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3