RetroSearch Browse

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23378060/ below:

Employment outcomes among survivors of common cancers: the Symptom Outcomes and Practice Patterns (SOAPP) study

doi: 10.1007/s11764-012-0258-2. Epub 2013 Feb 2. Employment outcomes among survivors of common cancers: the Symptom Outcomes and Practice Patterns (SOAPP) study

Affiliations

Affiliation

¹ University of Wisconsin Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1111 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53705-2275, USA. at4@medicine.wisc.edu

PMID: 23378060
PMCID: PMC3638888
DOI: 10.1007/s11764-012-0258-2

Item in Clipboard

Employment outcomes among survivors of common cancers: the Symptom Outcomes and Practice Patterns (SOAPP) study

A J Tevaarwerk et al. J Cancer Surviv. 2013 Jun.

doi: 10.1007/s11764-012-0258-2. Epub 2013 Feb 2. Affiliation

¹ University of Wisconsin Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1111 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53705-2275, USA. at4@medicine.wisc.edu

PMID: 23378060
PMCID: PMC3638888
DOI: 10.1007/s11764-012-0258-2

Item in Clipboard

Abstract

Introduction: Risk factors for employment difficulties after cancer diagnosis are incompletely understood, and interventions to improve post-cancer employment remain few. New targets for intervention are needed.

Methods: We assessed a cohort of 530 nonmetastatic cancer patients (aged ≤ 65 years, >6 months from diagnosis, off chemo- or radiotherapy) from the observational multi-site Symptom Outcomes and Practice Patterns study. Participants reported employment change, current employment, and symptoms. Groups were based on employment at survey (working full- or part-time versus not working) and whether there had been a change due to illness (yes versus no). The predictive power of symptom interference with work was evaluated for employment group (working stably versus no longer working). Race/ethnicity, gender, cancer type, therapy, and time since diagnosis were also assessed. Association between employment group and specific symptoms was examined.

Results: The cohort was largely non-Hispanic white (76 %), female (85 %), and diagnosed with breast cancer (75 %); 24 % reported a change in employment. On multivariable analysis, participants with at least moderate symptom interference were more likely to report no longer working than their less effected counterparts (odds ratio (OR) = 8.0, 95 % CI, 4.2-15.4), as were minority participants compared with their non-Hispanic white counterparts (OR = 3.2, 95 % CI, 1.8-5.6). Results from the multiple regression model indicated the combination of fatigue (OR = 2.3, 95 % CI, 1.1-4.7), distress (OR = 3.9, 95 % CI, 1.7-9.0), and dry mouth (OR = 2.6, 95 % CI, 1.1-6.2) together with race/ethnicity and time since diagnosis adequately accounted for employment group.

Conclusions: Our findings support the hypothesis that residual symptom burden is related to post-cancer employment: Residual symptoms may be targets for intervention to improve work outcomes among cancer survivors.

Implications for cancer survivors: This analysis examines whether increased symptom burden is associated with a change to not working following a cancer diagnosis. We also examined individual symptoms to assess which symptoms were most strongly associated with not working after a cancer diagnosis. Our hope is that we will be able to use this information to both screen survivors post-active treatment as well as target high-risk symptoms for further and more aggressive intervention, in an attempt to improve post-cancer work outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures
Fig. 1

Defining the cohort of interest,…

Fig. 1

Defining the cohort of interest, employment groups, and analysis population

Fig. 1

Defining the cohort of interest, employment groups, and analysis population