A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22864455/ below:

Socioeconomic variation in uptake of colonoscopy following a positive faecal occult blood test result: a retrospective analysis of the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme

. 2012 Aug 21;107(5):765-71. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.303. Epub 2012 Aug 2. Socioeconomic variation in uptake of colonoscopy following a positive faecal occult blood test result: a retrospective analysis of the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme G BaioE KendallC von WagnerJ WardleW AtkinS P HalloranG HandleyR F LoganA ObichereS RainbowS SmithJ SnowballR Raine

Affiliations

Affiliation

Item in Clipboard

Socioeconomic variation in uptake of colonoscopy following a positive faecal occult blood test result: a retrospective analysis of the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme

S Morris et al. Br J Cancer. 2012.

. 2012 Aug 21;107(5):765-71. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.303. Epub 2012 Aug 2. Authors S Morris  1 G BaioE KendallC von WagnerJ WardleW AtkinS P HalloranG HandleyR F LoganA ObichereS RainbowS SmithJ SnowballR Raine Affiliation

Item in Clipboard

Abstract

Background: Bowel cancer is a serious health burden and its early diagnosis improves survival. The Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in England screens with the Faecal Occult Blood test (FOBt), followed by colonoscopy for individuals with a positive test result. Socioeconomic inequalities have been demonstrated for FOBt uptake, but it is not known whether they persist at the next stage of the screening pathway. The aim of this study was to assess the association between colonoscopy uptake and area socioeconomic deprivation, controlling for individual age and sex, and area ethnic diversity, population density, poor self-assessed health, and region.

Methods: Logistic regression analysis of colonoscopy uptake using BCSP data for England between 2006 and 2009 for 24 180 adults aged between 60 and 69 years.

Results: Overall colonoscopy uptake was 88.4%. Statistically significant variation in uptake is found between quintiles of area deprivation (ranging from 86.4 to 89.5%), as well as age and sex groups (87.9-89.1%), quintiles of poor self-assessed health (87.5-89.5%), non-white ethnicity (84.6-90.6%) and population density (87.9-89.3%), and geographical regions (86.4-90%).

Conclusion: Colonoscopy uptake is high. The variation in uptake by socioeconomic deprivation is small, as is variation by subgroups of age and sex, poor self-assessed health, ethnic diversity, population density, and region.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1

Colonoscopy uptake among individuals with…

Figure 1

Colonoscopy uptake among individuals with a positive FOBt result. Number of individuals during…

Figure 1

Colonoscopy uptake among individuals with a positive FOBt result. Number of individuals during the period October 2006 to January 2009 is shown in brackets. Abbreviation: FOBt=Faecal Occult Blood test.

Figure 2

Adjusted plots of colonoscopy uptake…

Figure 2

Adjusted plots of colonoscopy uptake by deprivation ( A ), health ( B…

Figure 2

Adjusted plots of colonoscopy uptake by deprivation (A), health (B), ethnic diversity (C) and rurality (D). The solid lines show the relationship between the variables and the probability of colonoscopy uptake based on the coefficients in Model (2) in Supplementary Table A3 in the Supplementary Online Material. Predicted values are computed by fixing the other variables at their sample mean values. The range of the x-axis is limited to the 5th to the 95th percentile of the sample values of each variable. The dashed lines show the mean uptake rate across the sample (88.4%).

Similar articles Cited by References
    1. Cancer Research UK (2010) CancerStats key facts: large bowel cancer (colorectal cancer). Cancer Research UK: London
    1. Coleman M, Rachet B, Woods L, Miltry E, Riga M, Cooper N, Quinn MJ, Brenner H, Estève J (2004) Trends and socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival in England and Wales up to 2001. Br J Cancer 90: 1367–1373 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) (2005) DEFRA Classification of Local Authority Districts and Unitary Authorities in England: an Introductory Guide. DEFRA: London
    1. Eilbert KW, Carrol K, Peach J, Khatoon S, Basnett I, McCulloch N (2009) Approaches to improving breast cancer screening uptake: evidence and experience from Tower Hamlets. Br J Cancer 101: S64–S67 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Faivre J, Dancourt V, Lejeune C, Tazi MA, Lamour J, Gerard D, Dassonville F, Bonithon-Kopp C (2004) Reduction in colorectal cancer mortality by faecal occult blood screening in a French controlled study. Gastroenterology 126: 1674–1680 - PubMed

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.3