Affiliations
AffiliationItem in Clipboard
Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort studyRebecca A Hubbard et al. Ann Intern Med. 2011.
. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):481-92. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00004. AffiliationItem in Clipboard
Erratum inBackground: False-positive mammography results are common. Biennial screening may decrease the cumulative probability of false-positive results across many years of repeated screening but could also delay cancer diagnosis.
Objective: To compare the cumulative probability of false-positive results and the stage distribution of incident breast cancer after 10 years of annual or biennial screening mammography.
Design: Prospective cohort study.
Setting: 7 mammography registries in the National Cancer Institute-funded Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
Participants: 169,456 women who underwent first screening mammography at age 40 to 59 years between 1994 and 2006 and 4492 women with incident invasive breast cancer diagnosed between 1996 and 2006.
Measurements: False-positive recalls and biopsy recommendations stage distribution of incident breast cancer.
Results: False-positive recall probability was 16.3% at first and 9.6% at subsequent mammography. Probability of false-positive biopsy recommendation was 2.5% at first and 1.0% at subsequent examinations. Availability of comparison mammograms halved the odds of a false-positive recall (adjusted odds ratio, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.56]). When screening began at age 40 years, the cumulative probability of a woman receiving at least 1 false-positive recall after 10 years was 61.3% (CI, 59.4% to 63.1%) with annual and 41.6% (CI, 40.6% to 42.5%) with biennial screening. Cumulative probability of false-positive biopsy recommendation was 7.0% (CI, 6.1% to 7.8%) with annual and 4.8% (CI, 4.4% to 5.2%) with biennial screening. Estimates were similar when screening began at age 50 years. A non-statistically significant increase in the proportion of late-stage cancers was observed with biennial compared with annual screening (absolute increases, 3.3 percentage points [CI, -1.1 to 7.8 percentage points] for women age 40 to 49 years and 2.3 percentage points [CI, -1.0 to 5.7 percentage points] for women age 50 to 59 years) among women with incident breast cancer.
Limitations: Few women underwent screening over the entire 10-year period. Radiologist characteristics influence recall rates and were unavailable. Most mammograms were film rather than digital. Incident cancer was analyzed in a small sample of women who developed cancer.
Conclusion: After 10 years of annual screening, more than half of women will receive at least 1 false-positive recall, and 7% to 9% will receive a false-positive biopsy recommendation. Biennial screening appears to reduce the cumulative probability of false-positive results after 10 years but may be associated with a small absolute increase in the probability of late-stage cancer diagnosis.
Primary funding source: National Cancer Institute.
Summary for patients in[No authors listed] [No authors listed] Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):I14. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00001. Ann Intern Med. 2011. PMID: 22007059 No abstract available.
Ho TH, Bissell MCS, Kerlikowske K, Hubbard RA, Sprague BL, Lee CI, Tice JA, Tosteson ANA, Miglioretti DL. Ho TH, et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e222440. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.2440. JAMA Netw Open. 2022. PMID: 35333365 Free PMC article.
O'Meara ES, Zhu W, Hubbard RA, Braithwaite D, Kerlikowske K, Dittus KL, Geller B, Wernli KJ, Miglioretti DL. O'Meara ES, et al. Cancer. 2013 Nov 15;119(22):3959-67. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28310. Epub 2013 Aug 26. Cancer. 2013. PMID: 24037812 Free PMC article.
Braithwaite D, Zhu W, Hubbard RA, O'Meara ES, Miglioretti DL, Geller B, Dittus K, Moore D, Wernli KJ, Mandelblatt J, Kerlikowske K; Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Braithwaite D, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Mar 6;105(5):334-41. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs645. Epub 2013 Feb 5. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013. PMID: 23385442 Free PMC article.
Myers ER, Moorman P, Gierisch JM, Havrilesky LJ, Grimm LJ, Ghate S, Davidson B, Mongtomery RC, Crowley MJ, McCrory DC, Kendrick A, Sanders GD. Myers ER, et al. JAMA. 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1615-34. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.13183. JAMA. 2015. PMID: 26501537 Review.
Nelson HD, Pappas M, Cantor A, Griffin J, Daeges M, Humphrey L. Nelson HD, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):256-67. doi: 10.7326/M15-0970. Epub 2016 Jan 12. Ann Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 26756737 Review.
Brunyé TT, Booth K, Hendel D, Kerr KF, Shucard H, Weaver DL, Elmore JG. Brunyé TT, et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Feb 16;31(3):552-562. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad232. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024. PMID: 38031453 Free PMC article.
Le MT, Mothersill CE, Seymour CB, McNeill FE. Le MT, et al. Br J Radiol. 2016 Sep;89(1065):20160045. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160045. Epub 2016 Jun 8. Br J Radiol. 2016. PMID: 27187600 Free PMC article. Review.
Narayan AK, Keating DM, Morris EA, Mango VL. Narayan AK, et al. Clin Imaging. 2019 Jan-Feb;53:151-154. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.09.016. Epub 2018 Oct 5. Clin Imaging. 2019. PMID: 30340079 Free PMC article.
Zheng B, Tan M, Ramalingam P, Gur D. Zheng B, et al. Breast J. 2014 May-Jun;20(3):249-57. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12255. Epub 2014 Mar 27. Breast J. 2014. PMID: 24673749 Free PMC article.
Kimball CC, Nichols CI, Vose JG. Kimball CC, et al. Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2018 Jun 4;12:1178223418777766. doi: 10.1177/1178223418777766. eCollection 2018. Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2018. PMID: 29887731 Free PMC article.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3