Comparative Study
. 2011 Jul 10;29(20):2821-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.0522. Epub 2011 May 31. National estimates of out-of-pocket health care expenditure burdens among nonelderly adults with cancer: 2001 to 2008Affiliations
AffiliationItem in Clipboard
Comparative Study
National estimates of out-of-pocket health care expenditure burdens among nonelderly adults with cancer: 2001 to 2008Didem S M Bernard et al. J Clin Oncol. 2011.
. 2011 Jul 10;29(20):2821-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.0522. Epub 2011 May 31. AffiliationItem in Clipboard
AbstractPurpose: To compare the prevalence of high out-of-pocket burdens among patients with cancer with other chronically ill and well patients, and to examine the sociodemographic characteristics associated with high burdens among patients with cancer.
Methods: The sample included persons 18 to 64 years of age who received treatment for cancer, taken from a nationally representative sample of the US population from the 2001 to 2008 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. We examined the proportion of persons living in families with high out-of-pocket burdens associated with medical spending, including insurance premiums, relative to income, defining high health care (total) burden as spending more than 20% of income on health care (and premiums).
Results: The risk of high burdens is significantly greater for patients with cancer compared with other chronically ill and well patients. We find that 13.4% of patients with cancer had high total burdens, in contrast to 9.7% among those with other chronic conditions and 4.4% among those without chronic conditions. Among nonelderly persons with cancer, the following were associated with higher out-of-pocket burdens: private nongroup insurance, age 55 to 64 years, non-Hispanic black, never married or widowed, one child or no children, unemployed, lower income, lower education level, living in nonmetropolitan statistical areas, and having other chronic conditions.
Conclusion: High burdens may affect treatment choice and deter patients from getting care. Thus, although a detailed patient-physician discussion of costs of care may not be feasible, we believe that an awareness of out-of-pocket burdens among patients with cancer is useful for clinical oncologists.
Conflict of interest statementAuthors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
FiguresFig 1.
Prevalence of high total burdens…
Fig 1.
Prevalence of high total burdens among nonelderly adults by medical condition and age.…
Fig 1.Prevalence of high total burdens among nonelderly adults by medical condition and age. Calculations using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey–Household Component, 2001 to 2008. Total burden includes out-of-pocket expenditures on health insurance premiums and health care services for all family members. (*) Difference from the reference category (cancer) is significant at the 1% level.
Fig 2.
Prevalence of high total burdens…
Fig 2.
Prevalence of high total burdens among nonelderly adults by medical condition and insurance…
Fig 2.Prevalence of high total burdens among nonelderly adults by medical condition and insurance status. Calculations using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey–Household Component, 2001 to 2008. Total burden includes out-of-pocket expenditures on health insurance premiums and health care services for all family members. (*) Difference from the reference category (cancer) is significant at the 5% level. (†) Difference from the reference category (cancer) is significant at the 1% level.
Fig 3.
Prevalence of high out-of-pocket burdens…
Fig 3.
Prevalence of high out-of-pocket burdens among nonelderly adults receiving treatment for cancer by…
Fig 3.Prevalence of high out-of-pocket burdens among nonelderly adults receiving treatment for cancer by insurance status. Calculations using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey–Household Component, 2001 to 2008. Health care burden includes out-of-pocket expenditures on health insurance premiums and health care services for all family members. (*) Difference from the reference category (private group) is significant at the 1% level.
Fig 4.
Mean out-of-pocket expenditures by service…
Fig 4.
Mean out-of-pocket expenditures by service type among nonelderly adults receiving treatment for cancer…
Fig 4.Mean out-of-pocket expenditures by service type among nonelderly adults receiving treatment for cancer by insurance status. Calculations using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey–Household Component, 2001 to 2008. Health care burden includes out-of-pocket expenditures on health insurance premiums and health care services for all family members. (*) Difference from the reference category (private group) is significant at the 5% level. (†) Difference from the reference category (private group) is significant at the 1% level.
Fig 5.
Prevalence of high total burdens…
Fig 5.
Prevalence of high total burdens among cancer survivors receiving and not receiving treatment…
Fig 5.Prevalence of high total burdens among cancer survivors receiving and not receiving treatment for cancer. Calculations using the National Health Interview Survey–Medical Expenditure Panel Survey linked sample, 2001 to 2008. Total burden includes out-of-pocket expenditures on health insurance premiums and health care services for all family members. Sample size was too small to make reliable estimates for cancer survivors with private nongroup insurance who were not receiving treatment. (*) Difference from the reference category (cancer survivor receiving treatment) is significant at the 5% level. (†) Difference from the reference category (cancer survivor receiving treatment) is significant at the 1% level.
Similar articlesBernard DM, Johansson P, Fang Z. Bernard DM, et al. Am J Manag Care. 2014 May;20(5):406-13. Am J Manag Care. 2014. PMID: 25181569
Banthin JS, Bernard DM. Banthin JS, et al. JAMA. 2006 Dec 13;296(22):2712-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.22.2712. JAMA. 2006. PMID: 17164457
Goldman AL, Woolhandler S, Himmelstein DU, Bor DH, McCormick D. Goldman AL, et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Mar 1;178(3):347-355. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.8060. JAMA Intern Med. 2018. PMID: 29356828 Free PMC article.
Bernard DM, Banthin JS, Encinosa WE. Bernard DM, et al. Med Care. 2006 Mar;44(3):210-5. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000199729.25503.60. Med Care. 2006. PMID: 16501391
Blumberg LJ, Waidmann TA, Blavin F, Roth J. Blumberg LJ, et al. Milbank Q. 2014 Mar;92(1):88-113. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12042. Milbank Q. 2014. PMID: 24597557 Free PMC article.
Richard P, Patel N, Lu YC, Walker R, Younis M. Richard P, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 5;18(7):3790. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073790. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33916454 Free PMC article.
Agarwal A, Dayal A, Kircher SM, Chen RC, Royce TJ. Agarwal A, et al. JAMA Oncol. 2020 Mar 1;6(3):409-412. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.5690. JAMA Oncol. 2020. PMID: 31944219 Free PMC article.
Riggs KR, Buttorff C, Alexander GC. Riggs KR, et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2015 May;30(5):683-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3127-z. Epub 2014 Dec 4. J Gen Intern Med. 2015. PMID: 25472507 Free PMC article.
Coughlin SS, Moore JX, Cortes JE. Coughlin SS, et al. J Hosp Manag Health Policy. 2021 Sep;5:32. doi: 10.21037/jhmhp-20-68. Epub 2021 Sep 25. J Hosp Manag Health Policy. 2021. PMID: 34549166 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Narang AK, Nicholas LH. Narang AK, et al. JAMA Oncol. 2017 Jun 1;3(6):757-765. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.4865. JAMA Oncol. 2017. PMID: 27893028 Free PMC article.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3