Randomized Controlled Trial
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.02.019. Effectiveness of a web-based colorectal cancer screening patient decision aid: a randomized controlled trial in a mixed-literacy populationAffiliations
AffiliationItem in Clipboard
Randomized Controlled Trial
Effectiveness of a web-based colorectal cancer screening patient decision aid: a randomized controlled trial in a mixed-literacy populationDavid P Miller Jr et al. Am J Prev Med. 2011 Jun.
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.02.019. AffiliationItem in Clipboard
AbstractBackground: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening reduces mortality yet remains underutilized. Low health literacy may contribute to this underutilization by interfering with patients' ability to understand and receive preventive health services.
Purpose: To determine if a web-based multimedia CRC screening patient decision aid, developed for a mixed-literacy audience, could increase CRC screening.
Design: RCT. Patients aged 50-74 years and overdue for CRC screening were randomized to the web-based decision aid or a control program seen immediately before a scheduled primary care appointment.
Setting/participants: A large community-based, university-affiliated internal medicine practice serving a socioeconomically disadvantaged population.
Main outcome measures: Patients completed surveys to determine their ability to state a screening test preference and their readiness to receive screening. Charts were abstracted by masked observers to determine if screening tests were ordered and completed.
Results: Between November 2007 and September 2008, a total of 264 patients enrolled in the study. Data collection was completed in 2009, and data analysis was completed in 2010. A majority of participants (mean age=57.8 years) were female (67%), African-American (74%), had annual household incomes of <$20,000 (76%), and had limited health literacy (56%). When compared to control participants, more decision-aid participants had a CRC screening preference (84% vs 55%, p<0.0001) and an increase in readiness to receive screening (52% vs 20%, p=0.0001). More decision-aid participants had CRC screening tests ordered (30% vs 21%) and completed (19% vs 14%), but no statistically significant differences were seen (AOR=1.6, 95% CI=0.97, 2.8, and AOR=1.7, 95% CI=0.88, 3.2, respectively). Similar results were found across literacy levels.
Conclusions: The web-based decision aid increased patients' ability to form a test preference and their intent to receive screening, regardless of literacy level. Further study should examine ways the decision aid can be combined with additional system changes to increase CRC screening.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00558233.
Copyright © 2011 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
FiguresFigure 1
Representative screen shot from CHOICE…
Figure 1
Representative screen shot from CHOICE program. All written text is read aloud by…
Figure 1Representative screen shot from CHOICE program. All written text is read aloud by a narrator. Patients interact with the program via a touch-screen monitor. The full decision aid may be viewed at http://intmedweb.wfubmc.edu/choice/choice.html .
Figure 2
Patient enrollment and randomization a…
Figure 2
Patient enrollment and randomization a One patient allocated to CHOICE did not interact…
Figure 2Patient enrollment and randomization a One patient allocated to CHOICE did not interact with the program due to a computer malfunction. PCP, primary care provider
Similar articlesSchroy PC 3rd, Emmons KM, Peters E, Glick JT, Robinson PA, Lydotes MA, Mylvaganam SR, Coe AM, Chen CA, Chaisson CE, Pignone MP, Prout MN, Davidson PK, Heeren TC. Schroy PC 3rd, et al. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Dec;43(6):573-83. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.08.018. Am J Prev Med. 2012. PMID: 23159252 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Miller DP Jr, Denizard-Thompson N, Weaver KE, Case LD, Troyer JL, Spangler JG, Lawler D, Pignone MP. Miller DP Jr, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Apr 17;168(8):550-557. doi: 10.7326/M17-2315. Epub 2018 Mar 13. Ann Intern Med. 2018. PMID: 29532054 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Reuland DS, Brenner AT, Hoffman R, McWilliams A, Rhyne RL, Getrich C, Tapp H, Weaver MA, Callan D, Cubillos L, Urquieta de Hernandez B, Pignone MP. Reuland DS, et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jul 1;177(7):967-974. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1294. JAMA Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28505217 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Ramli NS, Manaf MRA, Hassan MR, Ismail MI, Nawi AM. Ramli NS, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 2;18(15):8190. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158190. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34360481 Free PMC article. Review.
Schroy PC 3rd, Emmons KM, Peters E, Glick JT, Robinson PA, Lydotes MA, Mylvaganam SR, Coe AM, Chen CA, Chaisson CE, Pignone MP, Prout MN, Davidson PK, Heeren TC. Schroy PC 3rd, et al. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Dec;43(6):573-83. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.08.018. Am J Prev Med. 2012. PMID: 23159252 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Duren-Winfield V, Onsomu EO, Case DL, Pignone M, Miller D Jr. Duren-Winfield V, et al. J Health Commun. 2015 Apr;20(4):491-8. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2014.976322. Epub 2015 Feb 26. J Health Commun. 2015. PMID: 25719814 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Hodges NL, Shoben AB, Paskett ED, Katz ML. Hodges NL, et al. J Community Support Oncol. 2016 Oct;14(10):420-426. doi: 10.12788/jcso.0209. J Community Support Oncol. 2016. PMID: 31179350 Free PMC article.
Katz ML, Fisher JL, Fleming K, Paskett ED. Katz ML, et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Jan;21(1):45-52. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0815. Epub 2011 Nov 8. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012. PMID: 22068288 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Miller DP Jr, Weaver KE, Case LD, Babcock D, Lawler D, Denizard-Thompson N, Pignone MP, Spangler JG. Miller DP Jr, et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Apr 11;5(4):e43. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7268. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017. PMID: 28400354 Free PMC article.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3