A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21029084/ below:

Coverage and preventive screening - PubMed

. 2011 Feb;46(1 Pt 1):173-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01188.x. Epub 2010 Oct 28. Coverage and preventive screening

Affiliations

Affiliation

Item in Clipboard

Coverage and preventive screening

Daniella Meeker et al. Health Serv Res. 2011 Feb.

. 2011 Feb;46(1 Pt 1):173-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01188.x. Epub 2010 Oct 28. Affiliation

Item in Clipboard

Abstract

Context: Preventive care has been shown as a high-value health care service. Many employers now offer expanded coverage of preventive care to encourage utilization.

Objective: To determine whether expanding coverage is an effective means to encourage utilization.

Design: Comparison of screening rates before and after introduction of deductible-free coverage.

Setting: People insured through large corporations between 2002 and 2006.

Patients or other participants: Preferred Provider Organization (PPO) enrollees from an employer introducing deductible-free coverage, and a control group enrolled in a PPO from a second employer with no policy change.

Main outcome measures: Adjusted probability of endoscopy, fecal occult blood test (FOBT), lipid screens, mammography, and Papanicolaou (pap) smears.

Intervention: Introduction of first-dollar coverage (FDC) of preventive services in 2003.

Results: After adjusting for demographics and secular trends, there were between 23 and 78 additional uses per 1,000 eligible patients of covered preventive screens (lipid screens, pap smears, mammograms, and FOBT), with no significant changes in the control group or in a service without FDC (endoscopy).

Conclusions: FDC improves utilization modestly among healthy individuals, particularly those in lower deductible plans. Compliance with guidelines can be encouraged by lowering out-of-pocket costs, but patients' predisposing characteristics merit attention.

© Health Research and Educational Trust.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles Cited by References
    1. American Cancer Society. 2008. “American Cancer Society Guidelines for the Early Detection of Cancer” [accessed on December 13, 2008]. Available at: http://www.cancer.org/docroot/ped/content/ped_2_3x_acs_cancer_detection_....
    1. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. 2006. “Health Savings Accounts Unlikely to Significantly Reduce Health Care Spending” [accessed on November 1, 2008]. Available at: http://www.cbpp.org/6-12-06health.htm.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2008. “Selected Preventative Screening Recommendations” [accessed on December 13, 2008]. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/hwi/resources/screening_matrix.htm.
    1. Chaudhry R, Scheitel SM, McMurtry EK, Leutink DJ, Cabanela RL, Naessens JM, Rahman AS, Davis LA, Stroebel RJ. Web-Based Proactive System to Improve Breast Cancer Screening: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2007;167(6):606–11. - PubMed
    1. Cherkin DL, Grothaus L, Wagner EH. The Effect of Office Visit Copayments on Preventive Care Services in an HMO. Inquiry. 1990;27(1):24–38. - PubMed

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.3