Affiliations
AffiliationItem in Clipboard
Health Belief Model Scale for Cervical Cancer and Pap Smear Test: psychometric testingGulten Guvenc et al. J Adv Nurs. 2011 Feb.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05450.x. Epub 2010 Oct 15. AffiliationItem in Clipboard
AbstractAim: This study is a report of the development and psychometric testing of the Health Belief Model Scale for Cervical Cancer and the Pap Smear Test.
Background: While the Champion Health Belief Model scales have been tested extensively for breast cancer and screening for this, evaluation of these scales in explaining the beliefs of women with regard to cervical cancer and the Pap Smear Test has only received limited attention.
Methods: This methodological research was carried out in Turkey in 2007. The data were collected with 237 randomly selected women who met the criteria for inclusion and agreed to participate in this study. The Champion Health Belief Model scales were translated into Turkish, adapted for cervical cancer, validated by professional experts, translated back into English and pilot-tested.
Findings: Factor analysis yielded five factors: Pap smear benefits and health motivation, Pap smear barriers, seriousness, susceptibility and health motivation. Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficients for the five subscales ranged from 0·62 to 0·86, and test-retest reliability coefficients ranged from 0·79 to 0·87 for the subscales.
Conclusion: The Health Belief Model Scale for Cervical Cancer and the Pap Smear Test was found to be a valid and reliable tool in assessing the women's health beliefs. Understanding the beliefs of women in respect of cervical cancer and the Pap Smear Test will help healthcare professionals to develop more effective cervical cancer screening programmes.
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Similar articlesBen-Natan M, Adir O. Ben-Natan M, et al. Int Nurs Rev. 2009 Dec;56(4):433-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2009.00728.x. Int Nurs Rev. 2009. PMID: 19930071
Park S, Chang S, Chung C. Park S, et al. Public Health Nurs. 2005 Jul-Aug;22(4):289-98. doi: 10.1111/j.0737-1209.2005.220404.x. Public Health Nurs. 2005. PMID: 16150010 Clinical Trial.
Amarin ZO, Badria LF, Obeidat BR. Amarin ZO, et al. East Mediterr Health J. 2008 Mar-Apr;14(2):389-97. East Mediterr Health J. 2008. PMID: 18561732
Eggleston KS, Coker AL, Das IP, Cordray ST, Luchok KJ. Eggleston KS, et al. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2007 Apr;16(3):311-30. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2006.0161. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2007. PMID: 17439377 Review.
Baileff A. Baileff A. Nurs Stand. 2000 Jul 19-25;14(44):35-7. doi: 10.7748/ns2000.07.14.44.35.c2880. Nurs Stand. 2000. PMID: 11975277 Review.
Shin HY, Kang P, Song SY, Jun JK. Shin HY, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 30;20(1):700. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010700. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36613020 Free PMC article.
Hoque ME, Ghuman S, Coopoosmay R, Van Hal G. Hoque ME, et al. PLoS One. 2014 Nov 11;9(11):e111557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111557. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 25387105 Free PMC article.
Khani Jeihooni A, Jormand H, Harsini PA. Khani Jeihooni A, et al. BMC Womens Health. 2021 Aug 6;21(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01419-w. BMC Womens Health. 2021. PMID: 34362375 Free PMC article.
Legasu TD, Temesgen K, Ayele ZT, Chekole MS, Bayou FD, Fetene JC, Tibebu AT, Taye BT, Ali MA. Legasu TD, et al. BMC Womens Health. 2022 Dec 2;22(1):484. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-02071-8. BMC Womens Health. 2022. PMID: 36461054 Free PMC article.
Hu D, Liu Z, Gong L, Kong Y, Liu H, Wei C, Wu X, Zhu Q, Guo Y. Hu D, et al. Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Aug 17;10(8):1336. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10081336. Vaccines (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36016224 Free PMC article.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3