Affiliations
AffiliationItem in Clipboard
Does the source of death information affect cancer screening efficacy results? A study of the use of mortality review versus death certificates in four randomized trialsV Paul Doria-Rose et al. Clin Trials. 2010 Feb.
doi: 10.1177/1740774509356461. AffiliationItem in Clipboard
AbstractBackground: Often in randomized controlled trials of cancer screening, cause of death is determined by a mortality review committee. However, little is known regarding how findings from mortality review compare to those from death certificates alone.
Purpose: To examine the results of four different U. S. trials of cancer screening when death certificate data only were used, as compared to results using all available mortality review information.
Methods: Trials included were the Health Insurance Plan of New York breast screening trial (HIP), the Minnesota trial of fecal occult blood testing, and the Johns Hopkins and Mayo Lung Projects, which each examined chest x-ray and sputum cytology. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and Cohen's kappa for death certificates were calculated for all arms of all trials. Separate intention-to-screen analyses were conducted for each trial using cause of death information from either death certificates alone or full mortality review data.
Results: Generally there was excellent agreement between the death certificates and the mortality review committee as to the underlying cause of death (kappa >0.85 in all cases); death certificate agreement was similar between arms in all trials. Modest changes in the screening effectiveness estimates were observed when mortality review information was utilized, ranging from a 9% decrease to a 2% increase in the calculated mortality rate ratios. However, in one instance (HIP) a statistically significant benefit of screening was observed when mortality review committee data were used (rate ratio (RR) 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62- 0.95) but not when death certificate data were used (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.65-1.03).
Limitations: Although considered to be the gold standard, even carefully conducted mortality review may result in errors in cause of death assignment.
Conclusions: For each trial, results were similar regardless of the source of cause of death information.
Similar articlesBrunekreef B, Beelen R, Hoek G, Schouten L, Bausch-Goldbohm S, Fischer P, Armstrong B, Hughes E, Jerrett M, van den Brandt P. Brunekreef B, et al. Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2009 Mar;(139):5-71; discussion 73-89. Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2009. PMID: 19554969
Machtay M, Glatstein E. Machtay M, et al. Oncologist. 1998;3(3):III-IV. Oncologist. 1998. PMID: 10388105
Goodman GE, Thornquist MD, Balmes J, Cullen MR, Meyskens FL Jr, Omenn GS, Valanis B, Williams JH Jr. Goodman GE, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Dec 1;96(23):1743-50. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh320. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004. PMID: 15572756 Clinical Trial.
Strauss GM, Gleason RE, Sugarbaker DJ. Strauss GM, et al. Chest. 1997 Mar;111(3):754-68. doi: 10.1378/chest.111.3.754. Chest. 1997. PMID: 9118717 Review.
Miller AB, Feld R, Fontana R, Gohagan JK, Jatoi I, Lawrence W Jr, Miller A, ProroK PC, Rajput A, Sherman M, Welch G, Wright P, Yurgalevitch S, Albertsen P. Miller AB, et al. Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2015;10(3):206-11. doi: 10.2174/1574887110666150730120752. Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2015. PMID: 26238119 Review.
Tubin S, Khan MK, Gupta S, Jeremic B. Tubin S, et al. Cancers (Basel). 2021 Feb 12;13(4):775. doi: 10.3390/cancers13040775. Cancers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33673332 Free PMC article. Review.
Walter SD, de Koning HJ, Hugosson J, Talala K, Roobol MJ, Carlsson S, Zappa M, Nelen V, Kwiatkowski M, Páez Á, Moss S, Auvinen A; ERSPC Cause of Death Committees. Walter SD, et al. Br J Cancer. 2017 Jan 3;116(1):141-148. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.378. Epub 2016 Nov 17. Br J Cancer. 2017. PMID: 27855442 Free PMC article.
Chen B, Li W. Chen B, et al. Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2010 Oct;13(10):992-8. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2010.10.11. Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2010. PMID: 20959074 Free PMC article. Review. Chinese.
Miller EA, Pinsky PF, Schoen RE, Prorok PC, Church TR. Miller EA, et al. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Feb;4(2):101-110. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30358-3. Epub 2018 Nov 29. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019. PMID: 30502933 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Chen B, Wang Y, Cao H, Liu D, Zhang S, Gao J, Yu J, Huang Y, Li W. Chen B, et al. J Digit Imaging. 2013 Feb;26(1):72-81. doi: 10.1007/s10278-012-9468-4. J Digit Imaging. 2013. PMID: 22411060 Free PMC article.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3