A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20040709/ below:

Computerized aid improves safety decision process for survivors of intimate partner violence

. 2010 Nov;25(11):1947-64. doi: 10.1177/0886260509354508. Epub 2009 Dec 29. Computerized aid improves safety decision process for survivors of intimate partner violence

Affiliations

Affiliation

Item in Clipboard

Computerized aid improves safety decision process for survivors of intimate partner violence

Nancy Glass et al. J Interpers Violence. 2010 Nov.

. 2010 Nov;25(11):1947-64. doi: 10.1177/0886260509354508. Epub 2009 Dec 29. Affiliation

Item in Clipboard

Abstract

A computerized safety decision aid was developed and tested with Spanish or English-speaking abused women in shelters or domestic violence (DV) support groups (n = 90). The decision aid provides feedback about risk for lethal violence, options for safety, assistance with setting priorities for safety, and a safety plan personalized to the user. Women reported that the decision aid was useful and provided much-needed privacy for making safety decisions. The majority (69%) reported severe to extreme danger in their relationship as scored by Danger Assessment (DA); only 60% reported having made a safety plan. After using the safety decision aid, the women felt more supported in their decision (p = .012) and had less total decisional conflict (p = .014). The study demonstrated that a computerized safety decision aid improved the safety planning process, as demonstrated by reduced decisional conflict after only one use in a sample of abused women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared that they had no conflicts of interests with respect to their authorship or the publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1

Screen shot of a sample…

Figure 1

Screen shot of a sample pairwise comparison

Figure 1

Screen shot of a sample pairwise comparison

Figure 2

Sample feedback of safety priorities

Figure 2

Sample feedback of safety priorities

Figure 2

Sample feedback of safety priorities

Figure 3

Sample Danger Assessment score and…

Figure 3

Sample Danger Assessment score and level of danger

Figure 3

Sample Danger Assessment score and level of danger

Figure 4

Decisional conflict measured pre- and…

Figure 4

Decisional conflict measured pre- and postsafety decision aid * p = .012. **…

Figure 4

Decisional conflict measured pre- and postsafety decision aid *p = .012. **p = .014.

Similar articles Cited by References
    1. Campbell JC. Assessing dangerousness in domestic violence cases: History, challenges, and opportunities. Criminology and Public Policy. 2005;4:653–672.
    1. Campbell JC, Glass N. Safety planning, danger, and lethality assessment. In: Mitchell CE, editor. Health care response to domestic violence. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. pp. 319–334.
    1. Campbell JC, Jones AS, Dienemann J, Kub J, Schollenberger J, O’Campo R, et al. Intimate partner violence and physical health consequences. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2002;162:1157–1163. - PubMed
    1. Campbell JC, Lewandowski LA. Mental and physical health effects of intimate partner violence on women and children. Psychiatric Clinics of North America. 1997;20:353–374. - PubMed
    1. Campbell JC, Webster D, Glass N. The Danger Assessment: Validation of a lethality risk assessment instrument for intimate partner femicide. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2009;24:653–674. - PMC - PubMed

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.3