Affiliations
AffiliationItem in Clipboard
Computerized aid improves safety decision process for survivors of intimate partner violenceNancy Glass et al. J Interpers Violence. 2010 Nov.
. 2010 Nov;25(11):1947-64. doi: 10.1177/0886260509354508. Epub 2009 Dec 29. AffiliationItem in Clipboard
AbstractA computerized safety decision aid was developed and tested with Spanish or English-speaking abused women in shelters or domestic violence (DV) support groups (n = 90). The decision aid provides feedback about risk for lethal violence, options for safety, assistance with setting priorities for safety, and a safety plan personalized to the user. Women reported that the decision aid was useful and provided much-needed privacy for making safety decisions. The majority (69%) reported severe to extreme danger in their relationship as scored by Danger Assessment (DA); only 60% reported having made a safety plan. After using the safety decision aid, the women felt more supported in their decision (p = .012) and had less total decisional conflict (p = .014). The study demonstrated that a computerized safety decision aid improved the safety planning process, as demonstrated by reduced decisional conflict after only one use in a sample of abused women.
Conflict of interest statementDeclaration of Conflicting Interests
The authors declared that they had no conflicts of interests with respect to their authorship or the publication of this article.
FiguresFigure 1
Screen shot of a sample…
Figure 1
Screen shot of a sample pairwise comparison
Figure 1Screen shot of a sample pairwise comparison
Figure 2
Sample feedback of safety priorities
Figure 2
Sample feedback of safety priorities
Figure 2Sample feedback of safety priorities
Figure 3
Sample Danger Assessment score and…
Figure 3
Sample Danger Assessment score and level of danger
Figure 3Sample Danger Assessment score and level of danger
Figure 4
Decisional conflict measured pre- and…
Figure 4
Decisional conflict measured pre- and postsafety decision aid * p = .012. **…
Figure 4Decisional conflict measured pre- and postsafety decision aid *p = .012. **p = .014.
Similar articlesGlass NE, Perrin NA, Hanson GC, Bloom TL, Messing JT, Clough AS, Campbell JC, Gielen AC, Case J, Eden KB. Glass NE, et al. Am J Prev Med. 2017 May;52(5):606-615. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.12.014. Epub 2017 Jan 17. Am J Prev Med. 2017. PMID: 28108189 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Eden KB, Perrin NA, Hanson GC, Messing JT, Bloom TL, Campbell JC, Gielen AC, Clough AS, Barnes-Hoyt JS, Glass NE. Eden KB, et al. Am J Prev Med. 2015 Apr;48(4):372-83. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.09.027. Epub 2014 Dec 26. Am J Prev Med. 2015. PMID: 25547929 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Memiah P, Kamau A, Opanga Y, Muhula S, Nyakeriga E, Humwa F, Cook C, Kingori C, Muriithi J. Memiah P, et al. Interact J Med Res. 2020 Dec 31;9(4):e19023. doi: 10.2196/19023. Interact J Med Res. 2020. PMID: 33382380 Free PMC article.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3