Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19731160/ below:

Socioeconomic status is associated with provision of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Affiliations

• ¹ University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.

• PMID: 19731160
• PMCID: PMC3041986
• DOI: 10.1080/10903120903144833

Item in Clipboard

Michael J Mitchell et al. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2009 Oct-Dec.

• ¹ University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.

• PMID: 19731160
• PMCID: PMC3041986
• DOI: 10.1080/10903120903144833

Item in Clipboard

Objective: Although socioeconomic status (SES) has been linked to multiple health outcomes, there have been few studies of the effect of SES on the provision of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) during cardiac arrest events and no studies that we know of on the effect of SES on the provision of dispatcher-assisted bystander CPR. This study sought to define the relationship between SES and the provision of bystander CPR in an emergency medical system that includes dispatcher-provided CPR instructions.

Methods: This study was a retrospective, cohort analysis of cardiac arrests due to cardiac causes occurring in private residences in King County, Washington, from January 1, 1999, to December 31, 2005. We used the tax-assessed value of the location of the cardiac arrest as an estimate of the SES of potential bystanders as well as multiple measures from 2000 Census data (education, employment, median household income, and race/ethnicity). We also examined the effect of patient and system characteristics that may affect the provision of bystander CPR. Logistic regression models were used to analyze the association of these factors with two outcomes: the provision of bystander CPR with and without dispatcher assistance.

Results: Forty-four percent (1,151/2,618) of cardiac arrest victims received bystander CPR. Four hundred fifty-seven people (17.5% of the entire study population, 39.7% of those who received any bystander CPR) received CPR without telephone instructions. A total of 694 people received dispatcher-assisted bystander CPR (25.6% of the entire population, 60.4% of those receiving any bystander CPR). After adjusting for demographic and care factors, we found a strong association between the tax-assessed value of the cardiac arrest location and increased odds of the provision of bystander CPR without dispatcher instructions and bystander CPR with dispatcher assistance compared with no bystander CPR.

Conclusions: This study suggests that higher bystander SES is associated with increased rates of bystander CPR with and without dispatcher instructions. CPR training programs that target lower-SES communities and assessment of these training methods may be warranted.

PubMed Disclaimer

The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper. The authors report no conflicts of interest. This study received no financial or material support from an outside agency or company.

Determination of study population. EMS…

Determination of study population. EMS = emergency medical services.

Determination of study population. EMS = emergency medical services.

• Dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survival in cardiac arrest.

  Rea TD, Eisenberg MS, Culley LL, Becker L. Rea TD, et al. Circulation. 2001 Nov 20;104(21):2513-6. doi: 10.1161/hc4601.099468. Circulation. 2001. PMID: 11714643

• Recognition of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during emergency calls and public awareness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in communities: A multilevel analysis.

  Lee SY, Ro YS, Shin SD, Song KJ, Hong KJ, Park JH, Kong SY. Lee SY, et al. Resuscitation. 2018 Jul;128:106-111. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.05.008. Epub 2018 May 8. Resuscitation. 2018. PMID: 29746984

• In patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, does the provision of dispatch cardiopulmonary resuscitation instructions as opposed to no instructions improve outcome: a systematic review of the literature.

  Bohm K, Vaillancourt C, Charette ML, Dunford J, Castrén M. Bohm K, et al. Resuscitation. 2011 Dec;82(12):1490-5. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.09.004. Epub 2011 Sep 16. Resuscitation. 2011. PMID: 21925129 Review.

• Sociodemographic factors associated with paediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review.

  Idrees S, Abdullah R, Anderson KK, Tijssen JA. Idrees S, et al. Resuscitation. 2023 Nov;192:109931. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109931. Epub 2023 Aug 9. Resuscitation. 2023. PMID: 37562664 Review.

• Characteristics of neighbourhoods with high incidence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and low bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation rates in England.

  Brown TP, Booth S, Hawkes CA, Soar J, Mark J, Mapstone J, Fothergill RT, Black S, Pocock H, Bichmann A, Gunson I, Perkins GD. Brown TP, et al. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2019 Jan 1;5(1):51-62. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcy026. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2019. PMID: 29961881 Free PMC article.

• Community Socioeconomic Status and Dispatcher-Assisted Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Patients with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

  Tzeng CF, Lu CH, Lin CH. Tzeng CF, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 29;18(3):1207. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031207. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33572872 Free PMC article.

• A mediation analysis of the effect of practical training on the relationship between demographic factors, and bystanders' self-efficacy in CPR performance.

  Yoon W, Ro YS, Cho SI. Yoon W, et al. PLoS One. 2019 Apr 29;14(4):e0215432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215432. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31034486 Free PMC article.

• Diffusion of cardiopulmonary resuscitation training to chinese immigrants with limited english proficiency.

  Yip MP, Ong B, Tu SP, Chavez D, Ike B, Painter I, Lam I, Bradley SM, Coronado GD, Meischke HW. Yip MP, et al. Emerg Med Int. 2011;2011:685249. doi: 10.1155/2011/685249. Epub 2011 Feb 21. Emerg Med Int. 2011. PMID: 22046544 Free PMC article.

• Barriers to bystander CPR in deprived communities: Findings from a qualitative study.

  Dobbie F, Uny I, Eadie D, Duncan E, Stead M, Bauld L, Angus K, Hassled L, MacInnes L, Clegg G. Dobbie F, et al. PLoS One. 2020 Jun 10;15(6):e0233675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233675. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32520938 Free PMC article.

1. 1. Rea TD, Eisenberg MS, Sinibaldi G, White RD. Incidence of EMS-treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the United States. Resuscitation. 2004;63:17–24. - PubMed
2. 1. American Heart Association. Statistical fact sheet, 2008 update ”out of hospital cardiac arrest—statistics.”. [Accessed July 7, 2008]. Available at: http://www.americanheart.org/downloadable/heart/1200089895981FS27SDCA08.pdf.
3. 1. Myerburg R, Castellanos A. Cardiac arrest and sudden cardiac death. In: Braumwald E, editor. Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1997. pp. 742–749.
4. 1. Cummins RO, Eisenberg MS, Hallstrom AP, Litwin PE. Survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with early initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med. 1985;3:114–119. - PubMed
5. 1. Cummins RO, Eisenberg MS. Prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Is it effective? JAMA. 1985;253:2408–2412. - PubMed

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.3