Affiliations
AffiliationItem in Clipboard
Clinical features and outcome of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer who harbor EML4-ALKAlice T Shaw et al. J Clin Oncol. 2009.
. 2009 Sep 10;27(26):4247-53. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.6993. Epub 2009 Aug 10. Authors Alice T Shaw 1 , Beow Y Yeap, Mari Mino-Kenudson, Subba R Digumarthy, Daniel B Costa, Rebecca S Heist, Benjamin Solomon, Hannah Stubbs, Sonal Admane, Ultan McDermott, Jeffrey Settleman, Susumu Kobayashi, Eugene J Mark, Scott J Rodig, Lucian R Chirieac, Eunice L Kwak, Thomas J Lynch, A John Iafrate AffiliationItem in Clipboard
AbstractPurpose: The EML4-ALK fusion oncogene represents a novel molecular target in a small subset of non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC). To aid in identification and treatment of these patients, we examined the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients who had NSCLC with and without EML4-ALK.
Patients and methods: Patients with NSCLC were selected for genetic screening on the basis of two or more of the following characteristics: female sex, Asian ethnicity, never/light smoking history, and adenocarcinoma histology. EML4-ALK was identified by using fluorescent in situ hybridization for ALK rearrangements and was confirmed by immunohistochemistry for ALK expression. EGFR and KRAS mutations were determined by DNA sequencing.
Results: Of 141 tumors screened, 19 (13%) were EML4-ALK mutant, 31 (22%) were EGFR mutant, and 91 (65%) were wild type (WT/WT) for both ALK and EGFR. Compared with the EGFR mutant and WT/WT cohorts, patients with EML4-ALK mutant tumors were significantly younger (P < .001 and P = .005) and were more likely to be men (P = .036 and P = .039). Patients with EML4-ALK-positive tumors, like patients who harbored EGFR mutations, also were more likely to be never/light smokers compared with patients in the WT/WT cohort (P < .001). Eighteen of the 19 EML4-ALK tumors were adenocarcinomas, predominantly the signet ring cell subtype. Among patients with metastatic disease, EML4-ALK positivity was associated with resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Patients in the EML4-ALK cohort and the WT/WT cohort showed similar response rates to platinum-based combination chemotherapy and no difference in overall survival.
Conclusion: EML4-ALK defines a molecular subset of NSCLC with distinct clinical characteristics. Patients who harbor this mutation do not benefit from EGFR TKIs and should be directed to trials of ALK-targeted agents.
Conflict of interest statementAuthors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
FiguresFig 1.
Diagnostic features of EML4-ALK –positive…
Fig 1.
Diagnostic features of EML4-ALK –positive non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). (A) Fuorescent in situ…
Fig 1.Diagnostic features of EML4-ALK–positive non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). (A) Fuorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) reveals a split of red and green probes that flank the ALK translocation site in an EML4-ALK–positive tumor (arrows). (B) ALK immunohistochemistry reveals cytoplasmic ALK staining. (C) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of the same tumor. Arrows in (B) and (C) indicate signet ring cells, which are commonly found in EML4-ALK–positive tumors.
Fig 2.
Time to progression (TTP) and…
Fig 2.
Time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) of EML4-ALK –positive patients compared…
Fig 2.Time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) of EML4-ALK–positive patients compared with patients who have EGFR mutant and wild-type (WT)/WT tumors. (A) TTP on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy. (B) TTP on any first-line, platinum-based, combination regimen. (C) Kaplan-Meier survival plots of OS.
Fig A1.
Example of reverse transcriptase polymerase…
Fig A1.
Example of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) detection of EML4-ALK in a…
Fig A1.Example of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) detection of EML4-ALK in a primary tumor sample and cell lines (RT-PCR for GAPDH expression was also performed as a control for RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis). In this patient (PID5), (A) RT-PCR and (B) DNA sequencing demonstrate the presence of EML4-ALK variant 5 (Wong DW, et al: Cancer 115:1723-1733, 2009), in which exon18 of EML4 is fused to exon20 of ALK (lane 1). NCI-H2228 and NCI-H3122 have previously been shown to harbor EML4-ALK variants 3 and 1, respectively (Koivunen JP, et al: Clin Cancer Res 14:4275-4283, 2008). Variant 1, which results from a fusion of EML4 exon13 with exon20 of ALK, is also detected in this assay (lane 3), whereas variant 3, in which EML4 exon6 is fused to exon20 of ALK, is not (lane 2).
Similar articlesWang Z, Zhang X, Bai H, Zhao J, Zhuo M, An T, Duan J, Yang L, Wu M, Wang S, Wang Y, Wu Y, Wang J. Wang Z, et al. Oncology. 2012;83(5):248-56. doi: 10.1159/000341381. Epub 2012 Sep 4. Oncology. 2012. PMID: 22964709
Miyanaga A, Shimizu K, Noro R, Seike M, Kitamura K, Kosaihira S, Minegishi Y, Shukuya T, Yoshimura A, Kawamoto M, Tsuchiya S, Hagiwara K, Soda M, Takeuchi K, Yamamoto N, Mano H, Ishikawa Y, Gemma A. Miyanaga A, et al. BMC Cancer. 2013 May 29;13:262. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-262. BMC Cancer. 2013. PMID: 23714228 Free PMC article.
Wu SG, Kuo YW, Chang YL, Shih JY, Chen YH, Tsai MF, Yu CJ, Yang CH, Yang PC. Wu SG, et al. J Thorac Oncol. 2012 Jan;7(1):98-104. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182370e30. J Thorac Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22124476
Gridelli C, Peters S, Sgambato A, Casaluce F, Adjei AA, Ciardiello F. Gridelli C, et al. Cancer Treat Rev. 2014 Mar;40(2):300-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2013.07.002. Epub 2013 Aug 7. Cancer Treat Rev. 2014. PMID: 23931927 Review.
Gerber DE, Gandhi L, Costa DB. Gerber DE, et al. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2014:e353-65. doi: 10.14694/EdBook_AM.2014.34.e353. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2014. PMID: 24857124 Review.
Wang J, Zhang Z, Zhang S. Wang J, et al. Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2013 Feb;16(2):91-6. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2013.02.06. Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2013. PMID: 23425901 Free PMC article. Review. Chinese.
Paik PK, Johnson ML, D'Angelo SP, Sima CS, Ang D, Dogan S, Miller VA, Ladanyi M, Kris MG, Riely GJ. Paik PK, et al. Cancer. 2012 Dec 1;118(23):5840-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27637. Epub 2012 May 17. Cancer. 2012. PMID: 22605530 Free PMC article.
Ekram J, Rathore A, Avila C, Hussein R, Alomar M. Ekram J, et al. Cancer Control. 2024 Jan-Dec;31:10732748241285755. doi: 10.1177/10732748241285755. Cancer Control. 2024. PMID: 39318033 Free PMC article. Review.
Tsakonas G, Kamali C, De Petris L, Friesland S, Lewensohn R, Ekman S. Tsakonas G, et al. Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jul 6;12(7):1804. doi: 10.3390/cancers12071804. Cancers (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32640547 Free PMC article.
Fang B, Mehran RJ, Heymach JV, Swisher SG. Fang B, et al. Chin J Cancer. 2015 Jul 2;34(7):295-309. doi: 10.1186/s40880-015-0028-4. Chin J Cancer. 2015. PMID: 26134262 Free PMC article. Review.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3