A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19130147/ below:

Challenges in the management of positive fecal occult blood tests

doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0893-5. Epub 2009 Jan 8. Challenges in the management of positive fecal occult blood tests

Affiliations

Affiliation

Item in Clipboard

Challenges in the management of positive fecal occult blood tests

Sandhya K Rao et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Mar.

doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0893-5. Epub 2009 Jan 8. Affiliation

Item in Clipboard

Abstract

Background: Many patients with a positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT) do not undergo follow-up evaluations.

Objective: To identify the rate of follow-up colonoscopy following a positive FOBT and determine underlying reasons for lack of follow-up.

Design: It is a retrospective chart review.

Participants: The subject group consisted of 1,041 adults with positive FOBTs within a large physician group practice from 2004 to 2006.

Measurements: We collected data on reasons for ordering FOBT, presence of prior colonoscopy, completed evaluations, and results of follow-up tests. We fit a multivariable logistic regression model to identify predictors of undergoing follow-up colonoscopy.

Results: Most positive FOBTs were ordered for routine colorectal cancer screening (76%), or evaluation of anemia (13%) or rectal bleeding (7%). Colonoscopy was completed in 62% of cases, with one-third of these procedures identifying a colorectal adenoma (29%) or cancer (4%). Factors associated with higher rates of follow-up colonoscopy included obtaining the FOBT for routine colorectal screening (odds ratio (OR) 1.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-2.29) and consultation with gastroenterology (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.46-2.72). Patients were less likely to undergo colonoscopy if they were older than 80 years old (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.31-0.92), younger than 50 years old (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.28-0.70), uninsured (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.27-0.93), or had undergone colonoscopy within the prior five years (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.23-0.44).

Conclusions: Clinical decisions and patient factors available at the time of ordering an FOBT impact performance of colonoscopy. Targeting physicians' understanding of the use of this test may improve follow-up and reduce inappropriate use of this test.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1

Planned and completed follow-up evaluations…

Figure 1

Planned and completed follow-up evaluations rates of planned and completed evaluations are indicated…

Figure 1

Planned and completed follow-up evaluations rates of planned and completed evaluations are indicated among 1,041 positive fecal occult blood tests.

Similar articles Cited by References
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.3322/CA.2007.0010', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.3322/ca.2007.0010'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '18287387', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18287387/'}]}
    2. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:71–96. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1056/NEJM199305133281901', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199305133281901'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '8474513', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8474513/'}]}
    2. Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, et al. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1365–71. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1016/S0140-6736(96)03386-7', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(96)03386-7'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '8942775', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8942775/'}]}
    2. Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, et al. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet. 1996;348:1472–7. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1016/S0140-6736(96)03430-7', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(96)03430-7'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '8942774', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8942774/'}]}
    2. Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, Jorgensen OD, Sondergaard O. Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet. 1996;348:1467–71. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '1736103', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1736103/'}]}
    2. Selby JV, Friedman GD, Quesenberry CP Jr., Weiss NS. A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:653–7. - PubMed

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.3