Randomized Controlled Trial
doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2261. Test, episode, and programme sensitivities of screening for colorectal cancer as a public health policy in Finland: experimental designAffiliations
AffiliationItem in Clipboard
Randomized Controlled Trial
Test, episode, and programme sensitivities of screening for colorectal cancer as a public health policy in Finland: experimental designNea Malila et al. BMJ. 2008.
AffiliationItem in Clipboard
AbstractObjectives: To report the sensitivities of the faecal occult blood test, screening episode, and screening programme for colorectal cancer and the benefits of applying a randomised design at the implementation phase of a new public health policy.
Design: Experimental design incorporated in public health evaluation using randomisation at individual level in the target population.
Setting: 161 of the 431 Finnish municipalities in 2004-6.
Participants: 106 000 adults randomised to screening or control arms. In total, 52 998 adults aged 60-64 in the screening arm received faecal occult blood test kits.
Main outcome measures: Test, episode, and programme sensitivities estimated by the incidence method and corrected for selective attendance and overdiagnosis.
Results: The response for screening was high overall (70.8%), and significantly better in women (78.1%) than in men (63.3%). The incidence of cancer in the controls was somewhat higher in men than in women (103 v 93 per 100 000 person years), which was not true for interval cancers (42 v 49 per 100 000 person years). The sensitivity of the faecal occult blood test was 54.6%. Only a few interval cancers were detected among those with positive test results, hence the episode sensitivity of 51.3% was close to the test sensitivity. At the population level the sensitivity of the programme was 37.5%.
Conclusions: Although relatively low, the sensitivity of screening for colorectal cancer with the faecal occult blood test in Finland was adequate. An experimental design is a prerequisite for evaluation of such a screening programme because the effectiveness of preventing deaths is likely to be small and results may otherwise remain inconclusive. Thus, screening for colorectal cancer using any primary test modality should be launched in a public health programme with randomisation of the target population at the implementation phase.
Conflict of interest statementCompeting interests: None declared.
FiguresFlow chart of Finnish colorectal cancer screening…
Flow chart of Finnish colorectal cancer screening programme. Screen detected cancers provide no follow-up time…
Flow chart of Finnish colorectal cancer screening programme. Screen detected cancers provide no follow-up time in current analysis
Comment inAustoker J, Hewitson P. Austoker J, et al. BMJ. 2008 Nov 20;337:a2207. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2207. BMJ. 2008. PMID: 19022839 No abstract available.
Malila N, Oivanen T, Hakama M. Malila N, et al. Z Gastroenterol. 2008 Apr;46 Suppl 1:S25-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-963490. Z Gastroenterol. 2008. PMID: 18368636
Malila N, Anttila A, Hakama M. Malila N, et al. J Med Screen. 2005;12(1):28-32. doi: 10.1258/0969141053279095. J Med Screen. 2005. PMID: 15814016 Clinical Trial.
Blom J, Törnberg S. Blom J, et al. J Med Screen. 2017 Sep;24(3):146-152. doi: 10.1177/0969141316682983. Epub 2017 Jan 31. J Med Screen. 2017. PMID: 28142309
Hewitson P, Glasziou P, Irwig L, Towler B, Watson E. Hewitson P, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;2007(1):CD001216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001216.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007. PMID: 17253456 Free PMC article. Review.
Sarkeala T, Färkkilä M, Anttila A, Hyöty M, Kairaluoma M, Rautio T, Voutilainen M, Helander S, Jäntti M, Lehtinen M, Patrikka L, Malila N, Heinävaara S. Sarkeala T, et al. BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 8;11(2):e046667. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046667. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 33558363 Free PMC article.
Morris EJ, Whitehouse LE, Farrell T, Nickerson C, Thomas JD, Quirke P, Rutter MD, Rees C, Finan PJ, Wilkinson JR, Patnick J. Morris EJ, et al. Br J Cancer. 2012 Aug 21;107(5):757-64. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.331. Epub 2012 Jul 31. Br J Cancer. 2012. PMID: 22850549 Free PMC article.
Boulind CE, Gould O, de Lacy Costello B, Allison J, White P, Ewings P, Wicaksono AN, Curtis NJ, Pullyblank A, Jayne D, Covington JA, Ratcliffe N, Turner C, Francis NK. Boulind CE, et al. Cancers (Basel). 2022 Apr 24;14(9):2127. doi: 10.3390/cancers14092127. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35565258 Free PMC article.
Mlakar DN, Bric TK, Škrjanec AL, Krajc M. Mlakar DN, et al. Radiol Oncol. 2018 Jul 12;52(4):413-421. doi: 10.2478/raon-2018-0025. Radiol Oncol. 2018. PMID: 30511936 Free PMC article.
Pitkäniemi J, Seppä K, Hakama M, Malminiemi O, Palva T, Vuoristo MS, Järvinen H, Paimela H, Pikkarainen P, Anttila A, Elovainio L, Hakulinen T, Karjalainen S, Pylkkänen L, Rautalahti M, Sarkeala T, Vertio H, Malila N. Pitkäniemi J, et al. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2015 Jun 8;2(1):e000034. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2015-000034. eCollection 2015. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 26462283 Free PMC article.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3