Affiliations
AffiliationItem in Clipboard
A new HPV-DNA test for cervical-cancer screening in developing regions: a cross-sectional study of clinical accuracy in rural ChinaYou-Lin Qiao et al. Lancet Oncol. 2008 Oct.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70210-9. Epub 2008 Sep 19. Authors You-Lin Qiao 1 , John W Sellors, Paul S Eder, Yan-Ping Bao, Jeanette M Lim, Fang-Hui Zhao, Bernhard Weigl, Wen-Hua Zhang, Roger B Peck, Ling Li, Feng Chen, Qing-Jing Pan, Attila T Lorincz AffiliationItem in Clipboard
AbstractBackground: A new test (careHPV; QIAGEN, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) has been developed to detect 14 high-risk types of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) in about 2.5 h, to screen women in developing regions for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). We did a cross-sectional study to assess the clinical accuracy of careHPV as a rapid screening test in two county hospitals in rural China.
Methods: From May 10 to June 15, 2007, the careHPV test was done locally by use of self-obtained vaginal and provider-obtained cervical specimens from a screening population-based set of 2530 women aged 30 to 54 years in Shanxi province, China. All women were assessed by visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), Digene High-Risk HPV HC2 DNA Test (HC2), liquid-based cytology, and colposcopy with directed biopsy and endocervical curettage as necessary. In 2388 women with complete data, 441 women with negative colposcopy, but unsatisfactory or abnormal cytology or who were positive on HC2 or the new careHPV test, were recalled for a second colposcopy, four-quadrant cervical biopsies, and endocervical curettage. An absence of independence between the tests was not adjusted for and the Bonferroni correction was used for multiple comparisons.
Findings: Complete data were available for 2388 (94.4%) women. 70 women had CIN2+ (moderate or severe CIN or cancer), of whom 23 had CIN3+. By use of CIN2+ as the reference standard and area-under-the-curve analysis with a two-sided alpha error level of 0.0083, the sensitivities and specificities of the careHPV test for a cut-off ratio cut-point of 0.5 relative light units, were 90.0% (95% CI 83.0-97.0) and 84.2% (82.7-85.7), respectively, on cervical specimens, and 81.4% (72.3-90.5) and 82.4% (80.8-83.9), respectively, on vaginal specimens (areas under the curve not significantly different, p=0.0596), compared with 41.4% (29.9-53.0) and 94.5% (93.6-95.4) for VIA (areas under the curve significantly different, p=0.0001 and p=0.0031, for cervical and vaginal-specimen comparisons for the careHPV test, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity of HC2 for cervical specimens were 97.1% (93.2-100) and 85.6% (84.2-87.1), respectively (areas under the curve not significantly different from the careHPV test on cervical specimens, p=0.0163).
Interpretation: The careHPV test is promising as a primary screening method for cervical-cancer prevention in low-resource regions.
Similar articlesLeinonen M, Nieminen P, Kotaniemi-Talonen L, Malila N, Tarkkanen J, Laurila P, Anttila A. Leinonen M, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Dec 2;101(23):1612-23. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp367. Epub 2009 Nov 9. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009. PMID: 19903804 Clinical Trial.
Castle PE, Stoler MH, Wright TC Jr, Sharma A, Wright TL, Behrens CM. Castle PE, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Sep;12(9):880-90. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70188-7. Epub 2011 Aug 22. Lancet Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21865084 Clinical Trial.
Zhao FH, Zhang WH, Pan QJ, Zhang X, Chen W, Liu B, Ma JF, Hu SY, Qiao YL. Zhao FH, et al. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2010 Jun;32(6):420-4. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2010. PMID: 20819481 Chinese.
Koliopoulos G, Nyaga VN, Santesso N, Bryant A, Martin-Hirsch PP, Mustafa RA, Schünemann H, Paraskevaidis E, Arbyn M. Koliopoulos G, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 10;8(8):CD008587. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008587.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28796882 Free PMC article. Review.
Ronco G, Confortini M, Maccallini V, Naldoni C, Segnan N, Sideri M, Zappa M, Zorzi M, Calvia M, Giorgi Rossi P. Ronco G, et al. Epidemiol Prev. 2012 Sep-Oct;36(5 Suppl 2):e1-e33. Epidemiol Prev. 2012. PMID: 23139163 Review. Italian.
Segondy M, Kelly H, Magooa MP, Djigma F, Ngou J, Gilham C, Omar T, Goumbri-Lompo O, Michelow P, Doutre S, Clavero O, Chikandiwa A, Sawadogo B, Didelot MN, Costes V, Méda N, Delany-Moretlwe S, Mayaud P. Segondy M, et al. Br J Cancer. 2016 Aug 9;115(4):425-30. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.207. Epub 2016 Jul 19. Br J Cancer. 2016. PMID: 27434037 Free PMC article.
Franceschi S, Wild CP. Franceschi S, et al. Mol Oncol. 2013 Feb;7(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2012.10.010. Epub 2012 Nov 17. Mol Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23218182 Free PMC article. Review.
Hu SY, Hong Y, Zhao FH, Lewkowitz AK, Chen F, Zhang WH, Pan QJ, Zhang X, Fei C, Li H, Qiao YL. Hu SY, et al. Chin J Cancer Res. 2011 Mar;23(1):25-32. doi: 10.1007/s11670-011-0025-3. Chin J Cancer Res. 2011. PMID: 23467401 Free PMC article.
Rositch AF, Gatuguta A, Choi RY, Guthrie BL, Mackelprang RD, Bosire R, Manyara L, Kiarie JN, Smith JS, Farquhar C. Rositch AF, et al. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040766. Epub 2012 Jul 10. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22808257 Free PMC article.
Campos NG, Sharma M, Clark A, Kim JJ, Resch SC. Campos NG, et al. PLoS One. 2016 Oct 6;11(10):e0164000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164000. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27711124 Free PMC article.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3