Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18691942/ below:

Risk of developing proximal versus distal colorectal cancer after a negative colonoscopy: a population-based study

Affiliations

• ¹ Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

• PMID: 18691942
• DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.05.016

Item in Clipboard

Josh Lakoff et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Oct.

• ¹ Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

• PMID: 18691942
• DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.05.016

Item in Clipboard

Background & aims: The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) overall is reduced for up to 10 years after a negative colonoscopy. The objective of this research was to determine the incidence of proximal and distal CRC after a negative complete colonoscopy.

Methods: A cohort of Ontario residents aged 50 to 80 years who had a negative complete colonoscopy between January 1, 1992, and December 31, 1997, was identified by using linked administrative databases. Cohort members had no prior history of CRC, inflammatory bowel disease, or recent colonic resection. Each individual was followed up through December 31, 2005, and the relative rate (RR) of overall CRC, distal CRC, and proximal CRC was compared with the remaining Ontario population.

Results: A cohort of 110,402 individuals with a negative complete colonoscopy was identified. The RR of CRC overall and the RR of distal CRC remained significantly lower than the Ontario population. For example, at year 14 the RR of distal CRC was 0.21 (95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.36). The RR of proximal CRC was significantly lower than the Ontario population in half of the follow-up years, mainly after 7 years of follow-up.

Conclusions: Over a 14-year follow-up period, negative complete colonoscopy was associated with a subsequent reduced incidence of CRC overall, and of incident CRC in the distal colon. However, the reduction in incidence of proximal CRC differed in magnitude and timing, and occurred in half the follow-up years, mainly after 7 years of follow-up. These results highlight an important limitation of colonoscopy in usual clinical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

• Risk of proximal and distal colorectal cancer following flexible sigmoidoscopy: a population-based cohort study.

  Rabeneck L, Lewis JD, Paszat LF, Saskin R, Stukel TA. Rabeneck L, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Aug;103(8):2075-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01932.x. Epub 2008 Aug 5. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008. PMID: 18684198

• Endoscopist specialty is associated with incident colorectal cancer after a negative colonoscopy.

  Rabeneck L, Paszat LF, Saskin R. Rabeneck L, et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Mar;8(3):275-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.10.022. Epub 2009 Oct 29. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010. PMID: 19879970

• A population-based estimate of the extent of colorectal cancer screening in Ontario.

  Rabeneck L, Paszat LF. Rabeneck L, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jun;99(6):1141-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30623.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004. PMID: 15180738

• Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II). Screening for colorectal cancer.

  Arditi C, Peytremann-Bridevaux I, Burnand B, Eckardt VF, Bytzer P, Agréus L, Dubois RW, Vader JP, Froehlich F, Pittet V, Schusselé Filliettaz S, Juillerat P, Gonvers JJ; EPAGE II Study Group. Arditi C, et al. Endoscopy. 2009 Mar;41(3):200-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1119626. Epub 2009 Mar 11. Endoscopy. 2009. PMID: 19280531 Review.

• Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II). Surveillance after polypectomy and after resection of colorectal cancer.

  Arditi C, Gonvers JJ, Burnand B, Minoli G, Oertli D, Lacaine F, Dubois RW, Vader JP, Schusselé Filliettaz S, Peytremann-Bridevaux I, Pittet V, Juillerat P, Froehlich F; EPAGE II Study Group. Arditi C, et al. Endoscopy. 2009 Mar;41(3):209-17. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1119646. Epub 2009 Mar 11. Endoscopy. 2009. PMID: 19280532 Review.

• Cigarette smoking and colorectal cancer risk by KRAS mutation status among older women.

  Samadder NJ, Vierkant RA, Tillmans LS, Wang AH, Lynch CF, Anderson KE, French AJ, Haile RW, Harnack LJ, Potter JD, Slager SL, Smyrk TC, Thibodeau SN, Cerhan JR, Limburg PJ. Samadder NJ, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 May;107(5):782-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.21. Epub 2012 Feb 21. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012. PMID: 22349355 Free PMC article.

• Quality measures for colonoscopy: where should we be in 2015?

  Allen JI. Allen JI. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2015 Mar;17(3):10. doi: 10.1007/s11894-015-0432-6. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2015. PMID: 25740247 Review.

• Progress and challenges in colorectal cancer screening.

  Quintero E, Hassan C, Senore C, Saito Y. Quintero E, et al. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2012;2012:846985. doi: 10.1155/2012/846985. Epub 2012 Apr 4. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2012. PMID: 22548053 Free PMC article.

• Factors Affecting Proximal Colon Cleansing Based on Bowel Movement Kinetics: A Prospective Observational Study.

  Kim DB, Lee KM, Kang SG, Jung SH. Kim DB, et al. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2019 Mar 3;2019:7032971. doi: 10.1155/2019/7032971. eCollection 2019. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2019. PMID: 30944564 Free PMC article.

• Sensitivity of immunochemical faecal occult blood testing for detecting left- vs right-sided colorectal neoplasia.

  Haug U, Kuntz KM, Knudsen AB, Hundt S, Brenner H. Haug U, et al. Br J Cancer. 2011 May 24;104(11):1779-85. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.160. Epub 2011 May 10. Br J Cancer. 2011. PMID: 21559011 Free PMC article.

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.3