Affiliations
AffiliationItem in Clipboard
Bone-mounted miniature robotic guidance for pedicle screw and translaminar facet screw placement: Part I--Technical development and a test case resultIsador H Lieberman et al. Neurosurgery. 2006 Sep.
. 2006 Sep;59(3):641-50; discussion 641-50. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000229055.00829.5B. AffiliationItem in Clipboard
AbstractObjective: To introduce a new miniature robot (SpineAssist; MAZOR Surgical Technologies, Caesarea, Israel) that has been developed and tested as a surgical assistant for accurate percutaneous placement of pedicle screws and translaminar facet screws.
Methods: Virtual projections in three planes-axial, lateral, and anteroposterior-are reconstructed for each vertebra from a preoperative computed tomographic (CT) scan. On a specially designed graphic user interface with proprietary software, the surgeon plans the trajectory of the screws. Intraoperative fluoroscopic x-rays with targeting devices are then matched with the CT-based virtual images, as well as the surgeon's plan. A clamp is attached to the spinous process or a minimally invasive frame (Hover-T frame; MAZOR Surgical Technologies) is mounted to the iliac crest and one spinous process. The miniature robot is then attached to the clamp and/or frame. On the basis of combined CT scan and fluoroscopic data, the robot aligns itself to the desired entry point and trajectory, as dictated by the surgeon's preoperative plan.
Results: A test case in a cadaver lumbar spine was performed in which four screws and two rods were inserted, using a minimally invasive technique, combining the SpineAssist system and Hover-T frame in conjunction with the PathFinder system (Spinal Concept Inc., Austin, TX). The discrepancy between the planned and actual screw trajectories was measured by means of postprocedural CT scan. Overall, the four screws were implanted with an average deviation of 1.02 +/- 0.56 mm (range, 0-1.5 mm) from the surgeon's plan.
Conclusion: These preliminary results confirm the system's accuracy and support its use in minimally invasive spine surgery applications.
Similar articlesTogawa D, Kayanja MM, Reinhardt MK, Shoham M, Balter A, Friedlander A, Knoller N, Benzel EC, Lieberman IH. Togawa D, et al. Neurosurgery. 2007 Feb;60(2 Suppl 1):ONS129-39; discussion ONS139. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000249257.16912.AA. Neurosurgery. 2007. PMID: 17297375
Barzilay Y, Liebergall M, Fridlander A, Knoller N. Barzilay Y, et al. Int J Med Robot. 2006 Jun;2(2):146-53. doi: 10.1002/rcs.90. Int J Med Robot. 2006. PMID: 17520625 Clinical Trial.
Sukovich W, Brink-Danan S, Hardenbrook M. Sukovich W, et al. Int J Med Robot. 2006 Jun;2(2):114-22. doi: 10.1002/rcs.86. Int J Med Robot. 2006. PMID: 17520622 Clinical Trial.
Dohi T. Dohi T. Nihon Rinsho. 2004 Apr;62(4):824-30. Nihon Rinsho. 2004. PMID: 15106355 Review. Japanese.
Waseem T. Waseem T. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2005 Sep;15(9):559-61. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2005. PMID: 16181577 Review.
Lieberman IH, Kisinde S, Hesselbacher S. Lieberman IH, et al. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2020 May 21;10(2):e0020. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.19.00020. eCollection 2020 Apr-Jun. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2020. PMID: 32944411 Free PMC article.
Fiani B, Quadri SA, Farooqui M, Cathel A, Berman B, Noel J, Siddiqi J. Fiani B, et al. Neurosurg Rev. 2020 Feb;43(1):17-25. doi: 10.1007/s10143-018-0971-z. Epub 2018 Apr 3. Neurosurg Rev. 2020. PMID: 29611081
Cao B, Yuan B, Xu G, Zhao Y, Sun Y, Wang Z, Zhou S, Xu Z, Wang Y, Chen X. Cao B, et al. J Digit Imaging. 2023 Aug;36(4):1919-1929. doi: 10.1007/s10278-023-00840-x. Epub 2023 May 2. J Digit Imaging. 2023. PMID: 37131064 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Hu Y, Zhu BK, Yuan ZS, Dong WX, Sun XY, Xu JZ, Chen XG. Hu Y, et al. J Int Med Res. 2019 Oct;47(10):5082-5093. doi: 10.1177/0300060519869719. Epub 2019 Aug 27. J Int Med Res. 2019. PMID: 31452418 Free PMC article.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3