Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16169887/ below:

Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening

Clinical Trial

Affiliations

• ¹ Department of Radiology, the Biomedical Research Imaging Center, and the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA. etta_pisano@med.unc.edu

• PMID: 16169887
• DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa052911

Item in Clipboard

Clinical Trial

Etta D Pisano et al. N Engl J Med. 2005.

• ¹ Department of Radiology, the Biomedical Research Imaging Center, and the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA. etta_pisano@med.unc.edu

• PMID: 16169887
• DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa052911

Item in Clipboard

• N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 26;355(17):1840

Background: Film mammography has limited sensitivity for the detection of breast cancer in women with radiographically dense breasts. We assessed whether the use of digital mammography would avoid some of these limitations.

Methods: A total of 49,528 asymptomatic women presenting for screening mammography at 33 sites in the United States and Canada underwent both digital and film mammography. All relevant information was available for 42,760 of these women (86.3 percent). Mammograms were interpreted independently by two radiologists. Breast-cancer status was ascertained on the basis of a breast biopsy done within 15 months after study entry or a follow-up mammogram obtained at least 10 months after study entry. Receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the results.

Results: In the entire population, the diagnostic accuracy of digital and film mammography was similar (difference between methods in the area under the ROC curve, 0.03; 95 percent confidence interval, -0.02 to 0.08; P=0.18). However, the accuracy of digital mammography was significantly higher than that of film mammography among women under the age of 50 years (difference in the area under the curve, 0.15; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.05 to 0.25; P=0.002), women with heterogeneously dense or extremely dense breasts on mammography (difference, 0.11; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.04 to 0.18; P=0.003), and premenopausal or perimenopausal women (difference, 0.15; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.05 to 0.24; P=0.002).

Conclusions: The overall diagnostic accuracy of digital and film mammography as a means of screening for breast cancer is similar, but digital mammography is more accurate in women under the age of 50 years, women with radiographically dense breasts, and premenopausal or perimenopausal women. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00008346.)

Copyright 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society.

PubMed Disclaimer

• Film or digital mammographic screening?

  Dershaw DD. Dershaw DD. N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 27;353(17):1846-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe058253. N Engl J Med. 2005. PMID: 16251541 No abstract available.

• Digital and film mammography.

  Crystal P, Strano S. Crystal P, et al. N Engl J Med. 2006 Feb 16;354(7):765-7; author reply 765-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc053270. N Engl J Med. 2006. PMID: 16481649 No abstract available.

• Digital and film mammography.

  Keen JD. Keen JD. N Engl J Med. 2006 Feb 16;354(7):765-7; author reply 765-7. N Engl J Med. 2006. PMID: 16482674 No abstract available.

• Digital and film mammography.

  Ebell MH. Ebell MH. N Engl J Med. 2006 Feb 16;354(7):765-7; author reply 765-7. N Engl J Med. 2006. PMID: 16482675 No abstract available.

• Diagnostic accuracy of Fischer Senoscan Digital Mammography versus screen-film mammography in a diagnostic mammography population.

  Cole E, Pisano ED, Brown M, Kuzmiak C, Braeuning MP, Kim HH, Jong R, Walsh R. Cole E, et al. Acad Radiol. 2004 Aug;11(8):879-86. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2004.04.003. Acad Radiol. 2004. PMID: 15288038

• Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.

  Skaane P, Balleyguier C, Diekmann F, Diekmann S, Piguet JC, Young K, Niklason LT. Skaane P, et al. Radiology. 2005 Oct;237(1):37-44. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2371041605. Epub 2005 Aug 11. Radiology. 2005. PMID: 16100086

• Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.

  Liang Z, Du X, Liu J, Yao X, Yang Y, Li K. Liang Z, et al. Acta Radiol. 2008 Jul;49(6):618-22. doi: 10.1080/02841850802014610. Acta Radiol. 2008. PMID: 18568552

• Status of mammography after the Digital Mammography Imaging Screening Trial: digital versus film.

  Dershaw DD. Dershaw DD. Breast J. 2006 Mar-Apr;12(2):99-102. doi: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00216.x. Breast J. 2006. PMID: 16509833 Review.

• [How to follow-up women with dense breasts by imaging?].

  Tardivon A. Tardivon A. J Radiol. 2008 Sep;89(9 Pt 2):1204-8. doi: 10.1016/s0221-0363(08)73931-3. J Radiol. 2008. PMID: 18772805 Review. French.

• Probing of breast cancer using a combination of plasma and urinary circulating cell-free DNA.

  Zuo Z, Tang J, Cai X, Ke F, Shi Z. Zuo Z, et al. Biosci Rep. 2020 Nov 27;40(11):BSR20194306. doi: 10.1042/BSR20194306. Biosci Rep. 2020. PMID: 33044511 Free PMC article.

• Recommendations on screening for breast cancer in average-risk women aged 40-74 years.

  Tonelli M, Connor Gorber S, Joffres M, Dickinson J, Singh H, Lewin G, Birtwhistle R, Fitzpatrick-Lewis D, Hodgson N, Ciliska D, Gauld M, Liu YY; Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. Tonelli M, et al. CMAJ. 2011 Nov 22;183(17):1991-2001. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.110334. CMAJ. 2011. PMID: 22106103 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

• High-resolution, low-dose phase contrast X-ray tomography for 3D diagnosis of human breast cancers.

  Zhao Y, Brun E, Coan P, Huang Z, Sztrókay A, Diemoz PC, Liebhardt S, Mittone A, Gasilov S, Miao J, Bravin A. Zhao Y, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Nov 6;109(45):18290-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1204460109. Epub 2012 Oct 22. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012. PMID: 23091003 Free PMC article.

• Contrast-enhanced mammography in breast cancer screening.

  Coffey K, Jochelson MS. Coffey K, et al. Eur J Radiol. 2022 Nov;156:110513. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110513. Epub 2022 Sep 10. Eur J Radiol. 2022. PMID: 36108478 Free PMC article. Review.

• Geographic variation in volumetric breast density between screening regions in the Netherlands.

  van der Waal D, Emaus MJ, Bakker MF, den Heeten GJ, Karssemeijer N, Pijnappel RM, Veldhuis WB, Verbeek AL, van Gils CH, Broeders MJ. van der Waal D, et al. Eur Radiol. 2015 Nov;25(11):3328-37. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3742-z. Epub 2015 Jul 3. Eur Radiol. 2015. PMID: 26134996 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.3