Clinical Trial
. 2005 May 4;97(9):643-55. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji112. Epidermal growth factor receptor gene and protein and gefitinib sensitivity in non-small-cell lung cancer Fred R Hirsch, Elisa Rossi, Stefania Bartolini, Giovanni L Ceresoli, Lynne Bemis, Jerry Haney, Samir Witta, Kathleen Danenberg, Irene Domenichini, Vienna Ludovini, Elisabetta Magrini, Vanesa Gregorc, Claudio Doglioni, Angelo Sidoni, Maurizio Tonato, Wilbur A Franklin, Lucio Crino, Paul A Bunn Jr, Marileila Varella-GarciaAffiliations
AffiliationItem in Clipboard
Clinical Trial
Epidermal growth factor receptor gene and protein and gefitinib sensitivity in non-small-cell lung cancerFederico Cappuzzo et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005.
. 2005 May 4;97(9):643-55. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji112. Authors Federico Cappuzzo 1 , Fred R Hirsch, Elisa Rossi, Stefania Bartolini, Giovanni L Ceresoli, Lynne Bemis, Jerry Haney, Samir Witta, Kathleen Danenberg, Irene Domenichini, Vienna Ludovini, Elisabetta Magrini, Vanesa Gregorc, Claudio Doglioni, Angelo Sidoni, Maurizio Tonato, Wilbur A Franklin, Lucio Crino, Paul A Bunn Jr, Marileila Varella-Garcia AffiliationItem in Clipboard
AbstractBackground: Gefitinib is a selective inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase, which is overexpressed in many cancers, including non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We carried out a clinical study to compare the relationship between EGFR gene copy number, EGFR protein expression, EGFR mutations, and Akt activation status as predictive markers for gefitinib therapy in advanced NSCLC.
Methods: Tumors from 102 NSCLC patients treated daily with 250 mg of gefitinib were evaluated for EGFR status by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), DNA sequencing, and immunohistochemistry and for Akt activation status (phospho-Akt [P-Akt]) by immunohistochemistry. Time to progression, overall survival, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method; groups were compared using the log-rank test. Risk factors associated with survival were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression modeling and multivariable analysis. All statistical tests were two-sided.
Results: Amplification or high polysomy of the EGFR gene (seen in 33 of 102 patients) and high protein expression (seen in 58 of 98 patients) were statistically significantly associated with better response (36% versus 3%, mean difference = 34%, 95% CI = 16.6 to 50.3; P<.001), disease control rate (67% versus 26%, mean difference = 40.6%, 95% CI = 21.5 to 59.7; P<.001), time to progression (9.0 versus 2.5 months, mean difference = 6.5 months, 95% CI = 2.8 to 10.3; P<.001), and survival (18.7 versus 7.0 months, mean difference = 11.7 months, 95% CI = 2.1 to 21.4; P = .03). EGFR mutations (seen in 15 of 89 patients) were also statistically significantly related to response and time to progression, but the association with survival was not statistically significant, and 40% of the patients with mutation had progressive disease. In multivariable analysis, only high EGFR gene copy number remained statistically significantly associated with better survival (hazard ratio = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.23 to 0.82). Independent of EGFR assessment method, EGFR+/P-Akt+ patients had a statistically significantly better outcome than EGFR-, P-Akt-, or EGFR+/P-Akt- patients.
Conclusions: High EGFR gene copy number identified by FISH may be an effective molecular predictor for gefitinib efficacy in advanced NSCLC.
Comment onVastag B. Vastag B. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 May 4;97(9):628-30. doi: 10.1093/jnci/97.9.628. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005. PMID: 15870431 No abstract available.
Cappuzzo F, Magrini E, Ceresoli GL, Bartolini S, Rossi E, Ludovini V, Gregorc V, Ligorio C, Cancellieri A, Damiani S, Spreafico A, Paties CT, Lombardo L, Calandri C, Bellezza G, Tonato M, Crinò L. Cappuzzo F, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Aug 4;96(15):1133-41. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh217. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004. PMID: 15292385 Clinical Trial.
Douillard JY, Shepherd FA, Hirsh V, Mok T, Socinski MA, Gervais R, Liao ML, Bischoff H, Reck M, Sellers MV, Watkins CL, Speake G, Armour AA, Kim ES. Douillard JY, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Feb 10;28(5):744-52. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.3030. Epub 2009 Dec 28. J Clin Oncol. 2010. PMID: 20038723 Clinical Trial.
Kaye FJ. Kaye FJ. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 May 4;97(9):621-3. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji127. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005. PMID: 15870427 No abstract available.
Zhang X, Zhang Y, Tang H, He J. Zhang X, et al. J Investig Med. 2017 Jan;65(1):72-81. doi: 10.1136/jim-2016-000252. Epub 2016 Sep 23. J Investig Med. 2017. PMID: 27664271 Review.
Hirsch FR, Witta S. Hirsch FR, et al. Curr Opin Oncol. 2005 Mar;17(2):118-22. doi: 10.1097/01.cco.0000155059.39733.9d. Curr Opin Oncol. 2005. PMID: 15725915 Review.
Jung M, Cho BC, Lee CH, Park HS, Kang YA, Kim SK, Chang J, Kim DJ, Rha SY, Kim JH, Lee JH. Jung M, et al. Yonsei Med J. 2012 Nov 1;53(6):1128-35. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2012.53.6.1128. Yonsei Med J. 2012. PMID: 23074112 Free PMC article.
Qiu S, Nikolaou S, Zhu J, Jeffery P, Goldin R, Kinross J, Alexander JL, Rasheed S, Tekkis P, Kontovounisios C. Qiu S, et al. Biomolecules. 2020 Aug 5;10(8):1145. doi: 10.3390/biom10081145. Biomolecules. 2020. PMID: 32764278 Free PMC article.
Hanna NH, Dahlberg SE, Kolesar JM, Aggarwal C, Hirsch FR, Ramalingam SS, Schiller JH. Hanna NH, et al. Cancer. 2015 Jul 1;121(13):2253-61. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29308. Epub 2015 Mar 4. Cancer. 2015. PMID: 25740387 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Lv N, Xie X, Ge Q, Lin S, Wang X, Kong Y, Shi H, Xie X, Wei W. Lv N, et al. Diagn Pathol. 2011 Dec 2;6:118. doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-6-118. Diagn Pathol. 2011. PMID: 22132735 Free PMC article.
Casadevall D, Gimeno J, Clavé S, Taus Á, Pijuan L, Arumí M, Lorenzo M, Menéndez S, Cañadas I, Albanell J, Serrano S, Espinet B, Salido M, Arriola E. Casadevall D, et al. Oncotarget. 2015 Jun 30;6(18):16215-26. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3976. Oncotarget. 2015. PMID: 26041880 Free PMC article.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3