Clinical Trial
. 2004 Oct 7;351(15):1513-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041318. Docetaxel and estramustine compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone for advanced refractory prostate cancer Catherine M Tangen, Maha H A Hussain, Primo N Lara Jr, Jeffrey A Jones, Mary Ellen Taplin, Patrick A Burch, Donna Berry, Carol Moinpour, Manish Kohli, Mitchell C Benson, Eric J Small, Derek Raghavan, E David CrawfordAffiliations
AffiliationItem in Clipboard
Clinical Trial
Docetaxel and estramustine compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone for advanced refractory prostate cancerDaniel P Petrylak et al. N Engl J Med. 2004.
Free article . 2004 Oct 7;351(15):1513-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041318. Authors Daniel P Petrylak 1 , Catherine M Tangen, Maha H A Hussain, Primo N Lara Jr, Jeffrey A Jones, Mary Ellen Taplin, Patrick A Burch, Donna Berry, Carol Moinpour, Manish Kohli, Mitchell C Benson, Eric J Small, Derek Raghavan, E David Crawford AffiliationItem in Clipboard
AbstractBackground: Mitoxantrone-based chemotherapy palliates pain without extending survival in men with progressive androgen-independent prostate cancer. We compared docetaxel plus estramustine with mitoxantrone plus prednisone in men with metastatic, hormone-independent prostate cancer.
Methods: We randomly assigned 770 men to one of two treatments, each given in 21-day cycles: 280 mg of estramustine three times daily on days 1 through 5, 60 mg of docetaxel per square meter of body-surface area on day 2, and 60 mg of dexamethasone in three divided doses before docetaxel, or 12 mg of mitoxantrone per square meter on day 1 plus 5 mg of prednisone twice daily. The primary end point was overall survival; secondary end points were progression-free survival, objective response rates, and post-treatment declines of at least 50 percent in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels.
Results: Of 674 eligible patients, 338 were assigned to receive docetaxel and estramustine and 336 to receive mitoxantrone and prednisone. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the median overall survival was longer in the group given docetaxel and estramustine than in the group given mitoxantrone and prednisone (17.5 months vs. 15.6 months, P=0.02 by the log-rank test), and the corresponding hazard ratio for death was 0.80 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.67 to 0.97). The median time to progression was 6.3 months in the group given docetaxel and estramustine and 3.2 months in the group given mitoxantrone and prednisone (P<0.001 by the log-rank test). PSA declines of at least 50 percent occurred in 50 percent and 27 percent of patients, respectively (P<0.001), and objective tumor responses were observed in 17 percent and 11 percent of patients with bidimensionally measurable disease, respectively (P=0.30). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenic fevers (P=0.01), nausea and vomiting (P<0.001), and cardiovascular events (P=0.001) were more common among patients receiving docetaxel and estramustine than among those receiving mitoxantrone and prednisone. Pain relief was similar in both groups.
Conclusions: The improvement in median survival of nearly two months with docetaxel and estramustine, as compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone, provides support for this approach in men with metastatic, androgen-independent prostate cancer.
Copyright 2004 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Similar articlesTannock IF, de Wit R, Berry WR, Horti J, Pluzanska A, Chi KN, Oudard S, Théodore C, James ND, Turesson I, Rosenthal MA, Eisenberger MA; TAX 327 Investigators. Tannock IF, et al. N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 7;351(15):1502-12. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040720. N Engl J Med. 2004. PMID: 15470213 Clinical Trial.
Oudard S, Banu E, Beuzeboc P, Voog E, Dourthe LM, Hardy-Bessard AC, Linassier C, Scotté F, Banu A, Coscas Y, Guinet F, Poupon MF, Andrieu JM. Oudard S, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2005 May 20;23(15):3343-51. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.12.187. Epub 2005 Feb 28. J Clin Oncol. 2005. PMID: 15738542 Clinical Trial.
Boehmer A, Anastasiadis AG, Feyerabend S, Nagele U, Kuczyk M, Schilling D, Corvin S, Merseburger AS, Stenzl A. Boehmer A, et al. Anticancer Res. 2005 Nov-Dec;25(6C):4481-6. Anticancer Res. 2005. PMID: 16334130 Clinical Trial.
Petrylak DP. Petrylak DP. Urology. 2005 Jun;65(6 Suppl):8-12. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.04.020. Urology. 2005. PMID: 15939077 Review.
Van Poppel H. Van Poppel H. Can J Urol. 2005 Feb;12 Suppl 1:81-5. Can J Urol. 2005. PMID: 15780173 Review.
Zhou T, Zeng SX, Ye DW, Wei Q, Zhang X, Huang YR, Ye ZQ, Yang Y, Zhang W, Tian Y, Zhou FJ, Jie J, Chen SP, Sun Y, Xie LP, Yao X, Na YQ, Sun YH. Zhou T, et al. PLoS One. 2015 Jan 27;10(1):e0117002. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117002. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 25625938 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Sadaghiani MS, Sheikhbahaei S, Werner RA, Pienta KJ, Pomper MG, Solnes LB, Gorin MA, Wang NY, Rowe SP. Sadaghiani MS, et al. Eur Urol. 2021 Jul;80(1):82-94. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.03.004. Epub 2021 Apr 8. Eur Urol. 2021. PMID: 33840558 Free PMC article.
Sung M, Giannakakou P. Sung M, et al. Oncogene. 2014 Mar 13;33(11):1418-28. doi: 10.1038/onc.2013.85. Epub 2013 Mar 25. Oncogene. 2014. PMID: 23524581 Free PMC article.
Nightingale G, Ryu J. Nightingale G, et al. P T. 2012 Aug;37(8):440-8. P T. 2012. PMID: 23091336 Free PMC article.
Gmeiner WH, Willingham MC, Bourland JD, Hatcher HC, Smith TL, D'Agostino RB Jr, Blackstock W. Gmeiner WH, et al. J Clin Oncol Res. 2014 Jul-Aug;2(4):1028. J Clin Oncol Res. 2014. PMID: 26020060 Free PMC article.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3