Affiliations
AffiliationItem in Clipboard
Trends in the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breastNancy N Baxter et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004.
. 2004 Mar 17;96(6):443-8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh069. AffiliationItem in Clipboard
AbstractBackground: An increase in incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast has been documented, and concerns regarding overly aggressive treatment have been raised. This study was designed to evaluate the use of surgery and radiation therapy in treating DCIS.
Methods: We used the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database to assess treatment of patients with DCIS with no evidence of microinvasion who were diagnosed from January 1, 1992, through December 31, 1999. We assessed the rates of mastectomy, breast reconstruction, radiation therapy after lumpectomy, and axillary dissection. Associations were analyzed by logistic regression.
Results: During the study period, 25 206 patients met selection criteria. The incidence of DCIS dramatically increased with time; however, the incidence of comedo lesions did not change. The rate of mastectomy decreased from 43% in 1992 to 28% in 1999, after controlling for age, race, tumor size, comedo histology, and geographic location. However, because of the increase in the diagnosis of DCIS, the age-adjusted incidence of mastectomy for DCIS in the population did not change (7.8 per 100 000 women in 1992 and 1999). Almost half the patients undergoing lumpectomy did not undergo radiation therapy (55% in 1992 and 46% in 1999); in those with comedo histology, 33% did not undergo radiation therapy after lumpectomy, even in 1999. Overall, patients were less likely to have axillary dissection over time (34% in 1992 versus 15% in 1999), yet the rate of axillary dissection was still high (30%) in patients undergoing mastectomy in 1999. Large, statistically and clinically significant variation by geographic location was found in treatment.
Conclusions: Treatment of DCIS changed in a clinically significant fashion between 1992 and 1999. Throughout this study, many patients were found to undergo aggressive surgical therapy, including mastectomy and axillary dissection, whereas others appeared to be undertreated, e.g., not receiving radiation therapy after lumpectomy, even in the presence of adverse histologic features. Variation in demographic and geographic factors indicates that at least some of these treatment differences reflect individual and institutional practice patterns that may be modifiable.
Comment inMorrow M. Morrow M. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Mar 17;96(6):424-5. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh088. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004. PMID: 15026460 No abstract available.
Gold HT, Dick AW. Gold HT, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Jun 2;96(11):887-8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh173. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004. PMID: 15173279 No abstract available.
Intra M, Rotmensz N, Viale G, Veronesi U. Intra M, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Jul 21;96(14):1110-1. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh213. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004. PMID: 15265976 No abstract available.
Gøtzsche PC. Gøtzsche PC. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Aug 18;96(16):1257; author reply 1259-60. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh248. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004. PMID: 15316062 No abstract available.
Zorbas H, Luxford K, Evans A, Villanueva EV. Zorbas H, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Aug 18;96(16):1258; author reply 1259-60. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh249. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004. PMID: 15316063 No abstract available.
Schwartz GF, Lagios MD, Silverstein MJ. Schwartz GF, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Aug 18;96(16):1258-9; author reply 1259-60. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh250. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004. PMID: 15316064 No abstract available.
Rakovitch E, Pignol JP, Chartier C, Hanna W, Kahn H, Wong J, Mai V, Paszat L. Rakovitch E, et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007 Mar;101(3):335-47. doi: 10.1007/s10549-006-9302-0. Epub 2006 Jul 13. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007. PMID: 16838110
Worni M, Akushevich I, Greenup R, Sarma D, Ryser MD, Myers ER, Hwang ES. Worni M, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Sep 30;107(12):djv263. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv263. Print 2015 Dec. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015. PMID: 26424776 Free PMC article.
Wu X, Chen VW, Ruiz B, Andrews PA, Hsieh MC, Schmidt BA, Correa CN, Fontham ET. Wu X, et al. J La State Med Soc. 2003 Jul-Aug;155(4):206-13. J La State Med Soc. 2003. PMID: 14506828
Virnig BA, Tuttle TM, Shamliyan T, Kane RL. Virnig BA, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Feb 3;102(3):170-8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp482. Epub 2010 Jan 13. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010. PMID: 20071685 Review.
Leonard GD, Swain SM. Leonard GD, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Jun 16;96(12):906-20. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh164. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004. PMID: 15199110 Review.
Goka ET, Lippman ME. Goka ET, et al. Oncogene. 2015 Oct 16;34(42):5395-405. doi: 10.1038/onc.2014.468. Epub 2015 Feb 9. Oncogene. 2015. PMID: 25659579 Free PMC article.
Tunon-de-Lara C, Chauvet MP, Baranzelli MC, Baron M, Piquenot J, Le-Bouédec G, Penault-Llorca F, Garbay JR, Blanchot J, Mollard J, Maisongrosse V, Mathoulin-Pélissier S, MacGrogan G. Tunon-de-Lara C, et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Nov;22(12):3853-60. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4476-5. Epub 2015 Mar 17. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25777085 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Boler DE, Cabioglu N, Ince U, Esen G, Uras C. Boler DE, et al. ISRN Surg. 2012;2012:394095. doi: 10.5402/2012/394095. Epub 2012 May 14. ISRN Surg. 2012. PMID: 22666611 Free PMC article.
Shapiro-Wright HM, Julian TB. Shapiro-Wright HM, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010(41):145-9. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgq026. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010. PMID: 20956820 Free PMC article. Review.
Gladman DD, Menter A. Gladman DD, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Mar;64 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii101-2. doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.030825. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005. PMID: 15708919 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3