Affiliations
AffiliationItem in Clipboard
Use of indoor tanning facilities by white adolescents in the United StatesCatherine A Demko et al. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003 Sep.
. 2003 Sep;157(9):854-60. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.157.9.854. AffiliationItem in Clipboard
AbstractContext: Indoor tanning is a risk factor for skin cancer, but the population-based prevalence of this behavior among adolescents is not clearly known.
Objectives: To describe the prevalence of tanning booth use among white US adolescents and to assess its association with sociodemographic factors, health behaviors, and appearance.
Design, setting, and participants: A nationally representative sample of 6903 non-Hispanic white adolescents, aged 13 to 19 years, who participated in Wave II (between April 1, 1996, and August 31, 1996) of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health.
Main outcome measure: Frequency of lifetime use of indoor artificial tanning facilities.
Results: With the data weighted to national levels, 36.8% of the white female adolescents and 11.2% of the white male adolescents have used a tanning booth at least once in their life, while 28.1% and 6.9% of the female and male adolescents, respectively, reported tanning booth use 3 or more times. The percentage of female adolescents using tanning booths 3 or more times increased with age, from 11.2% of the 13- to 14-year-olds to 47.0% of 18- to 19-year-olds and also increased with greater tanning ability, from 12.6% of the poor tanners to 38.1% of those with a strong tan response. After multivariate adjustment, those residing in the Midwest (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.53-3.68) or South (aOR, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.89-4.53), attending a rural high school (aOR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.09-2.98), and reporting the use of 2 or 3 substances (aOR, 3.06; 95% CI, 2.44-3.82) were more likely to use indoor tanning facilities, as were dieters (aOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.01-1.57) regardless of their body mass index. Decreased odds of indoor tanning were observed among those with a college-educated mother (aOR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51-0.90) and greater cognitive ability (per 10-point score increase; aOR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.96) while routine participation in physical activity significantly lowered the odds of indoor tanning only among female adolescents.
Conclusions: Indoor tanning is prevalent, particularly among female adolescents, and aligns with other risk behaviors, appearance-related factors, and intentional sunbathing. The risks of artificial tanning need increased emphasis among adolescents, especially in the Midwest and South where extremes in the availability of natural light appear to send intentional tanners indoors.
Comment inDellavalle RP, Schilling LM, Chen AK, Hester EJ. Dellavalle RP, et al. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003 Sep;157(9):845-6. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.157.9.845. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003. PMID: 12963585 No abstract available.
Stryker JE, Lazovich D, Forster JL, Emmons KM, Sorensen G, Demierre MF. Stryker JE, et al. J Adolesc Health. 2004 Dec;35(6):528.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.02.014. J Adolesc Health. 2004. PMID: 15581535
Lazovich D, Stryker JE, Mayer JA, Hillhouse J, Dennis LK, Pichon L, Pagoto S, Heckman C, Olson A, Cokkinides V, Thompson K. Lazovich D, et al. Arch Dermatol. 2008 Feb;144(2):225-30. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2007.45. Arch Dermatol. 2008. PMID: 18283180
Zeller S, Lazovich D, Forster J, Widome R. Zeller S, et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006 Apr;54(4):589-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2005.12.038. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006. PMID: 16546579
Cokkinides VE, Bandi P, Weinstock MA, Ward E. Cokkinides VE, et al. Arch Dermatol. 2010 Sep;146(9):987-92. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2010.220. Arch Dermatol. 2010. PMID: 20855697
Lazovich D, Forster J. Lazovich D, et al. Eur J Cancer. 2005 Jan;41(1):20-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.09.015. Eur J Cancer. 2005. PMID: 15617988 Review.
Olson AL, Gaffney CA, Starr P, Dietrich AJ. Olson AL, et al. Health Educ Res. 2008 Oct;23(5):763-9. doi: 10.1093/her/cym005. Epub 2007 Nov 26. Health Educ Res. 2008. PMID: 18039727 Free PMC article.
Daniel LC, Heckman CJ, Kloss JD, Manne SL. Daniel LC, et al. Cancer Causes Control. 2009 Apr;20(3):313-21. doi: 10.1007/s10552-008-9245-3. Epub 2008 Oct 18. Cancer Causes Control. 2009. PMID: 18931926 Free PMC article.
Joel Hillhouse GC, Thompson JK, Jacobsen PB, Hillhouse J. Joel Hillhouse GC, et al. J Behav Med. 2009 Dec;32(6):532-44. doi: 10.1007/s10865-009-9224-5. J Behav Med. 2009. PMID: 19653089
Blake KD, Moss JL, Gaysynsky A, Srinivasan S, Croyle RT. Blake KD, et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 Jul;26(7):992-997. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0092. Epub 2017 Jun 9. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017. PMID: 28600296 Free PMC article.
Sivamani RK, Crane LA, Dellavalle RP. Sivamani RK, et al. Dermatol Clin. 2009 Apr;27(2):149-54, vi. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2008.11.008. Dermatol Clin. 2009. PMID: 19254658 Free PMC article. Review.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3