Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11966386/ below:

The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology

Review

Affiliations

• ¹ EPN Room 2130, 6130 Executive Blvd, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. ds87v@nih.gov

• PMID: 11966386
• DOI: 10.1001/jama.287.16.2114

Item in Clipboard

Review

Diane Solomon et al. JAMA. 2002.

• ¹ EPN Room 2130, 6130 Executive Blvd, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. ds87v@nih.gov

• PMID: 11966386
• DOI: 10.1001/jama.287.16.2114

Item in Clipboard

Objectives: The Bethesda 2001 Workshop was convened to evaluate and update the 1991 Bethesda System terminology for reporting the results of cervical cytology. A primary objective was to develop a new approach to broaden participation in the consensus process.

Participants: Forum groups composed of 6 to 10 individuals were responsible for developing recommendations for discussion at the workshop. Each forum group included at least 1 cytopathologist, cytotechnologist, clinician, and international representative to ensure a broad range of views and interests. More than 400 cytopathologists, cytotechnologists, histopathologists, family practitioners, gynecologists, public health physicians, epidemiologists, patient advocates, and attorneys participated in the workshop, which was convened by the National Cancer Institute and cosponsored by 44 professional societies. More than 20 countries were represented.

Evidence: Literature review, expert opinion, and input from an Internet bulletin board were all considered in developing recommendations. The strength of evidence of the scientific data was considered of paramount importance.

Consensus process: Bethesda 2001 was a year-long iterative review process. An Internet bulletin board was used for discussion of issues and drafts of recommendations. More than 1000 comments were posted to the bulletin board over the course of 6 months. The Bethesda Workshop, held April 30-May 2, 2001, was open to the public. Postworkshop recommendations were posted on the bulletin board for a last round of critical review prior to finalizing the terminology.

Conclusions: Bethesda 2001 was developed with broad participation in the consensus process. The 2001 Bethesda System terminology reflects important advances in biological understanding of cervical neoplasia and cervical screening technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

• Bethesda 2001.

  Smith JH. Smith JH. Cytopathology. 2002 Feb;13(1):4-10. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.2002.00397.x. Cytopathology. 2002. PMID: 11985563 Review.

• New Bethesda terminology and evidence-based management guidelines for cervical cytology findings.

  Stoler MH. Stoler MH. JAMA. 2002 Apr 24;287(16):2140-1. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.16.2140. JAMA. 2002. PMID: 11966390 No abstract available.

• Cervical cytology classification and the Bethesda System.

  Davey DD. Davey DD. Cancer J. 2003 Sep-Oct;9(5):327-34. doi: 10.1097/00130404-200309000-00002. Cancer J. 2003. PMID: 14690307 Review.

• The Pap Test and Bethesda 2014. "The reports of my demise have been greatly exaggerated." (after a quotation from Mark Twain).

  Nayar R, Wilbur DC. Nayar R, et al. Acta Cytol. 2015;59(2):121-32. doi: 10.1159/000381842. Epub 2015 May 19. Acta Cytol. 2015. PMID: 25997404 Review.

• 2001 Consensus Guidelines for the management of women with cervical cytological abnormalities.

  Wright TC Jr, Cox JT, Massad LS, Twiggs LB, Wilkinson EJ; ASCCP-Sponsored Consensus Conference. Wright TC Jr, et al. JAMA. 2002 Apr 24;287(16):2120-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.16.2120. JAMA. 2002. PMID: 11966387 Review.

• Self-sampling for high-risk human papillomavirus as a follow-up alternative after treatment of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

  Östensson E, Belkić K, Ramqvist T, Mints M, Andersson S. Östensson E, et al. Oncol Lett. 2021 Apr;21(4):240. doi: 10.3892/ol.2021.12501. Epub 2021 Jan 31. Oncol Lett. 2021. PMID: 33664804 Free PMC article.

• Anal warts and anal intradermal neoplasia.

  Echenique I, Phillips BR. Echenique I, et al. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2011 Mar;24(1):31-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1272821. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2011. PMID: 22379403 Free PMC article.

• Long-term protection of HPV test in women at risk of cervical cancer.

  Ibáñez R, Roura E, Monfil L, Rodríguez LA, Sardà M, Crespo N, Pascual A, Martí C, Fibla M, Gutiérrez C, Lloveras B, Oliveras G, Torrent A, Català I, Bosch FX, Bruni L, de Sanjosé S. Ibáñez R, et al. PLoS One. 2020 Aug 27;15(8):e0237988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237988. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32853216 Free PMC article.

• Cancer Screening: Should Cancer Screening be Essential Component of Primary Health Care in Developing Countries?

  Bobdey S, Balasubramanium G, Kumar A, Jain A. Bobdey S, et al. Int J Prev Med. 2015 Jul 6;6:56. doi: 10.4103/2008-7802.160053. eCollection 2015. Int J Prev Med. 2015. PMID: 26236443 Free PMC article. Review.

• Prognostic value of HPV E6/E7 mRNA assay in women with negative colposcopy or CIN1 histology result: a follow-up study.

  Giorgi Rossi P, Benevolo M, Vocaturo A, Caraceni D, Ciccocioppo L, Frega A, Terrenato I, Zappacosta R, French D, Rosini S. Giorgi Rossi P, et al. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057600. Epub 2013 Feb 27. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23460880 Free PMC article.

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.3