Affiliations
AffiliationItem in Clipboard
The direct and indirect effects of cost-sharing on the use of preventive servicesG Solanki et al. Health Serv Res. 2000 Feb.
. 2000 Feb;34(6):1331-50. AffiliationItem in Clipboard
AbstractObjective: To test empirically a model for estimating the direct and indirect effects of different forms of cost-sharing on the utilization of recommended clinical preventive services. DATA SOURCES/SETTINGS: Stratified random sample of 10,872 employees, 18-64 years, who had belonged to their plan for at least one year, from seven large companies that were members of the Pacific Business Group on Health (PBGH) in 1994.
Data collection: The 1994 PBGH Health Plan Value Check Survey. 1994 PBGH data on requirements for employee out-of-pocket patient cost-sharing for 52 different health plans.
Design: Five equations were derived to estimate the direct and indirect effects of two forms of cost-sharing (copayments and coinsurance/deductibles) in two forms of managed care (HMOs and PPO/indemnity plans) on four clinical preventive services: mammography screening, cervical cancer screening, blood pressure screening, and preventive counseling. Probit models were used to estimate elasticities for the indirect and direct effects.
Principal findings: Both forms of cost-sharing in both plan types had negative and significant indirect effects on preventive counseling (from -1 percent to -7 percent). The direct effect of cost-sharing was negative for preventive counseling (-5 percent to -9 percent) and Pap smears (from -3 percent to -9 percent) in both HMOs and PPOs, and for mammography only in PPOs (-3 percent to -9 percent). The results of the effects on blood pressure screening are inconclusive.
Conclusions: Both the direct and indirect effects of cost-sharing negatively affected the receipt of preventive counseling in HMOs and PPOs. As predicted, the direct negative effect of cost-sharing was greater than the indirect effect for Pap smears and mammography. Eliminating cost-sharing for these services may be important to increasing their utilization to recommended levels.
Similar articlesSolanki G, Schauffler HH. Solanki G, et al. Am J Prev Med. 1999 Aug;17(2):127-33. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00057-4. Am J Prev Med. 1999. PMID: 10490055
Rowe JW, Brown-Stevenson T, Downey RL, Newhouse JP. Rowe JW, et al. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Jan-Feb;27(1):113-20. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.1.113. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008. PMID: 18180485
Naessens JM, Khan M, Shah ND, Wagie A, Pautz RA, Campbell CR. Naessens JM, et al. Med Care. 2008 Oct;46(10):1033-40. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318185cdac. Med Care. 2008. PMID: 18815524
Morrisey MA. Morrisey MA. Health Serv Res. 2001 Apr;36(1 Pt 2):191-221. Health Serv Res. 2001. PMID: 11327174 Free PMC article. Review.
Remler DK, Greene J. Remler DK, et al. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:293-311. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090804. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009. PMID: 18976141 Review.
Waghray A, Jain A, Waghray N. Waghray A, et al. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2016 May;4(2):136-40. doi: 10.1093/gastro/gow005. Epub 2016 Apr 11. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2016. PMID: 27071411 Free PMC article.
O'Malley AS, Forrest CB, Mandelblatt J. O'Malley AS, et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Feb;17(2):144-54. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10431.x. J Gen Intern Med. 2002. PMID: 11841530 Free PMC article.
Han X, Robin Yabroff K, Guy GP Jr, Zheng Z, Jemal A. Han X, et al. Prev Med. 2015 Sep;78:85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.07.012. Epub 2015 Jul 23. Prev Med. 2015. PMID: 26209914 Free PMC article.
Lemon S, Zapka J, Puleo E, Luckmann R, Chasan-Taber L. Lemon S, et al. Am J Public Health. 2001 Aug;91(8):1264-72. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.8.1264. Am J Public Health. 2001. PMID: 11499116 Free PMC article.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3