Review
. 1999 Apr 3;353(9159):1119-26. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)02143-1. Influence of delay on survival in patients with breast cancer: a systematic reviewAffiliations
AffiliationItem in Clipboard
Review
Influence of delay on survival in patients with breast cancer: a systematic reviewM A Richards et al. Lancet. 1999.
. 1999 Apr 3;353(9159):1119-26. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)02143-1. AffiliationItem in Clipboard
AbstractBackground: Most patients with breast cancer are detected after symptoms occur rather than through screening. The impact on survival of delays between the onset of symptoms and the start of treatment is controversial and cannot be studied in randomised controlled trials. We did a systematic review of observational studies (worldwide) of duration of symptoms and survival.
Methods: We identified 87 studies (101,954 patients) with direct data linking delay (including delay by patients) and survival. We classified studies for analysis by type of data in the original reports: category I studies had actual 5-year survival data (38 studies, 53,912 patients); category II used actuarial or multivariate analyses (21 studies, 25,102 patients); and category III was all other types of data (28 studies, 22,940 patients). We tested the main hypothesis that longer delays would be associated with lower survival, and a secondary hypothesis that longer delays were associated with more advanced stage, which would account for lower survival.
Findings: In category I studies, patients with delays of 3 months or more had 12% lower 5-year survival than those with shorter delays (odds ratio for death 1.47 [95% CI 1.42-1.53]) and those with delays of 3-6 months had 7% lower survival than those with shorter delays (1.24 [1.17-1.30]). In category II, 13 of 14 studies with unrestricted samples showed a significant adverse relation between longer delays and survival, whereas four of five studies of only patients with operable disease showed no significant relation. In category III, all three studies with unrestricted samples supported the primary hypothesis. The 13 informative studies showed that longer delays were associated with more advanced stage. In studies that controlled for stage, longer delay was not associated with shorter survival when the effect of stage on survival was taken into account.
Interpretation: Delays of 3-6 months are associated with lower survival. These effects cannot be accounted for by lead-time bias. Efforts should be made to keep delays by patients and providers to a minimum.
Comment inCoates AS. Coates AS. Lancet. 1999 Apr 3;353(9159):1112-3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)00082-3. Lancet. 1999. PMID: 10209969 No abstract available.
Benson EA. Benson EA. Lancet. 1999 Jun 19;353(9170):2154; author reply 2155. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)99108-0. Lancet. 1999. PMID: 10382714 No abstract available.
Nosarti C, Crayford T, Roberts J, McKenzie K, David A. Nosarti C, et al. Lancet. 1999 Jun 19;353(9170):2154; author reply 2155. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)75586-0. Lancet. 1999. PMID: 10382715 No abstract available.
Bentzen SM, Dische S, Bond S. Bentzen SM, et al. Lancet. 1999 Jun 19;353(9170):2155-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)75589-6. Lancet. 1999. PMID: 10382717 No abstract available.
Crawford SM. Crawford SM. Lancet. 1999 Oct 23;354(9188):1478. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)77623-6. Lancet. 1999. PMID: 10543704 No abstract available.
Richards MA, Smith P, Ramirez AJ, Fentiman IS, Rubens RD. Richards MA, et al. Br J Cancer. 1999 Feb;79(5-6):858-64. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690137. Br J Cancer. 1999. PMID: 10070881 Free PMC article.
Kothari A, Fentiman IS. Kothari A, et al. Int J Clin Pract. 2003 Apr;57(3):200-3. Int J Clin Pract. 2003. PMID: 12723724 Review.
Ramirez AJ, Westcombe AM, Burgess CC, Sutton S, Littlejohns P, Richards MA. Ramirez AJ, et al. Lancet. 1999 Apr 3;353(9159):1127-31. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)02142-x. Lancet. 1999. PMID: 10209975 Review.
Benbakhta B, Tazi M, Benjaafar N, Khattabi A, Maaroufi A. Benbakhta B, et al. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2015 Jun;63(3):191-201. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2015.03.121. Epub 2015 May 11. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2015. PMID: 25975777 French.
Sainsbury R, Johnston C, Haward B. Sainsbury R, et al. Lancet. 1999 Apr 3;353(9159):1132-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)02374-0. Lancet. 1999. PMID: 10209976
Noguchi S, Takahata O, Tsukada A, Shimada M, Kikuchi N. Noguchi S, et al. Cureus. 2022 Sep 28;14(9):e29674. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29674. eCollection 2022 Sep. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 36321014 Free PMC article.
Ferrua M, Couralet M, Nitenberg G, Morin S, Serin D, Minvielle E. Ferrua M, et al. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jun 21;12:167. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-167. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012. PMID: 22721001 Free PMC article.
Odeh B, Kayyali R, Nabhani-Gebara S, Philip N. Odeh B, et al. Support Care Cancer. 2015 Jul;23(7):2183-8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2627-7. Epub 2015 Feb 4. Support Care Cancer. 2015. PMID: 25649121 Review.
Redaniel MT, Martin RM, Ridd MJ, Wade J, Jeffreys M. Redaniel MT, et al. PLoS One. 2015 May 1;10(5):e0126608. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126608. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 25933397 Free PMC article.
Flynn SJ, Livaudais-Toman J, Kaplan CP, Kerlikowske K, Burke NJ, Pathak S, Karliner LS. Flynn SJ, et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2023 May;38(7):1786-1788. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07967-7. Epub 2022 Nov 30. J Gen Intern Med. 2023. PMID: 36451017 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3