Metric Interchange Formats describe character string encodings for numerical values and units which:
Additionally, CMIXF
incorporates [ISO 4217] currency names.
According to [NASA 1999] Arthur Stephenson, chairman of the Mars Climate Orbiter Mission Failure Investigation Board:
"The 'root cause' of the loss of the spacecraft was the failed translation of English units into metric units in a segment of ground-based, navigation-related mission software, ..."
Although the [ISO 6093] standard for automated interchange of numerical data is widely used, standardized measurement units (other than for page formating) are not routinely attached to interchange data.
The audience for metric standards extends beyond scientists and engineers. In the preface to Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) [NIST 811], B. Taylor writes:
The International System of Units, universally abbreviated SI, is the modern metric system of measurement. Long the dominant measurement system used in science, the SI is becoming the dominant measurement system used in international commerce.
This, and the widespread use of metric prefixes with currency symbols motivates the inclusion of [ISO 4217] currency names.
DevelopmentsIn 2002, Jon Krom, Arnold Reinhold, and I devised an extension to Metric Interchange Format (MIXF
) to incorporate monetary units based on [ISO 4217].
I was somewhat dissatisfied with it because, while currency exchange rates change hourly, physical units are unchanging; also, there was little use of metric prefixes with currencies on the web at that time.
Then in 2006 I noticed that the [CODATA] Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical Constants had changed, requiring changes to two MIXF
conversion factors!
Recent web searches find that ISO currency names are frequently being used with SI prefixes (eg. kUSD and MEUR). Its time to finish the extension of MIXF
to currencies: CMIXF
.
I have created a mailing list for discussion of unit formats and development of the CMIXF
draft. Visit Slib-units Info Page to join.
In 2002 the RFC editor decided that metric-interchange-format-03 was not within the IETF's purview. Since then I have hosted MIXF
at http://people.csail.mit.edu/jaffer/MIXF. Is there some standards organization which CMIXF
would be suitable for?
ReferencesDate: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 18:12:03 GMT Subject: draft-jaffer-metric-interchange-format-03.txt Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, iesg@ietf.org From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Aubrey, We apologize for the delayed response. The RFC Editor has completed the review of <draft-jaffer-metric-interchange-format-03.txt>. We cannot publish this document as an RFC, as we are the wrong standards body for this type of publication. Thank you. RFC Editor
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4