Emile van Sebille wrote:
> Yes, it comes up. Generally, except for short-circuiting, the
> solutions
> follow:
>
> >>> 1 and 2 or 3
> 2
> >>> 0 and 2 or 3
> 3
Yeah, but the short-circuiting exceptions are what make that construct
not worth using, since if used identically as a replacement for a
conditional expression, it won't work when a is 0 (or any other
expression that evaluates to false).
There's a failsafe solution, which is just to use an if: ... else: ...
statement. I was just wondering why it hasn't crept into Python at some
point, especially since augmented assignments already have, and seem at
the same level of "convenience" (arguably less in fact, since an
augmented assignment is still a statement, not an expression).
--
Erik Max Francis / max at alcyone.com / http://www.alcyone.com/max/
__ San Jose, CA, US / 37 20 N 121 53 W / ICQ16063900 / &tSftDotIotE
/ \ If I had known, I would have become a watchmaker.
\__/ Albert Einstein
blackgirl international / http://www.blackgirl.org/
The Internet resource for black women.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4