Jim Hefferon wrote: [snip] > Somebody else in this thread mentioned quantum computation. I've > tried to read up on it, but I'm afraid I didn't get it. Is it the > case that anything quantum computable is Turing computable, that is, > quantum computability may go faster but doesn't add anything > actually new? Well there's biological computation, in which each fork() grows it's own "CPU", thus making some formerly non-computable problems computable. No, I didn't make that up, and yes, I probably got something subtly wrong, thus ensuring the non-boundedness of this thread... - Gordon
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4