Chris Angelico wrote: > Except that it does. After calling locals() a second time, the result > of the *first* call will be updated to reflect changes. Yeow. That's *really* unintuitive. There had better be an extremely good reason for this behaviour. -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4