Hi, On Thu, 23 May 2019 at 17:28, Steve Dower <steve.dower at python.org> wrote: > On 23May2019 0636, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > However, I think the PR does show that the proposed technique can be > > implemented without too much additional code complexity, and will > > hopefully be adaptable for all implementations that emulate the frame > > API at all. > > Much excitement! > > One of the things I like best about this change is that it actually > makes it *easier* for alternative implementations to use a simpler frame > object without having to emulate CPython semantics (I'd love to get to a > place where bug-for-bug compatibility wasn't required, but this is where > we are right now so *shrug*). Thanks Nick for getting this through! A bientôt, Armin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4