On 5/24/2019 9:09 PM, Random832 wrote: > On Thu, May 23, 2019, at 15:27, Steve Holden wrote: >> Besides which, it would be lovely to have a major release that didn't >> involve any pain at all for the majority of users! >> >> Our erstwhile BDFL always eschewed two-digit version identifiers- due >> to the possibility for confusion about collating sequence, I beleive.. >> We should honour his preferences by going from 3.9 to 4.0. > Is 4.0 still gonna install as "python3", pip3, etc, executable as "py -3" on windows? I can see that being a pain point even if nothing else is. Maybe by then it can go back to just being python, as 2.x will be past end-of-life. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20190524/366fab89/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4