On Thu, May 23, 2019, at 15:27, Steve Holden wrote: > Besides which, it would be lovely to have a major release that didn't > involve any pain at all for the majority of users! > > Our erstwhile BDFL always eschewed two-digit version identifiers- due > to the possibility for confusion about collating sequence, I beleive.. > We should honour his preferences by going from 3.9 to 4.0. Is 4.0 still gonna install as "python3", pip3, etc, executable as "py -3" on windows? I can see that being a pain point even if nothing else is.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4