Le 21/05/2019 à 20:16, Brett Cannon a écrit : > > > On Tue., May 21, 2019, 09:10 Christian Heimes, <christian at python.org > <mailto:christian at python.org>> wrote: > > On 21/05/2019 17.31, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > > > As I said, if the main annoyance with nntplib is the sporadic test > > failures, then the relevant tests can be disabled on CI. > > > > NNTP itself is still used, even if less and less. > > I don't like the idea to drop a third of the test cases for nntplib > -- and the 30% that actually test that Python's NNTP library can > talk to an actual NNTP server. IMHO it's more beneficial for core > development and for nntplib to have it maintained by somebody that > cares about the library. > > > Ditto for me. If the code isn't going to be properly tested then it's > already unsupported, at which point we're back to wanting to deprecate it. So I should never have added those tests and then we wouldn't be talking about removing nntplib. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4