RetroSearch Browse

Tue May 21 08:25:14 EDT 2019 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2019-May/157538.html

On Dienstag, 21. Mai 2019 13:50:30 CEST Victor Stinner wrote:

> Well, that makes sense. But so, what is the metric to decide if a
> module is "widely used" or not?

Yes. Exactly the question that pops up right now. I think, that's the main 
issue when including batteries in general (that's not news though :-). And 
the problem I see there is: There *is* no valid answer.

(Sorry if I seem to be just annoying. That's not intended, I'm just not 
carrying the good news.)

nd
-- 
package Hacker::Perl::Another::Just;print
qq~@{[reverse split/::/ =>__PACKAGE__]}~;

#  André Malo  #  http://www.perlig.de  #

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2019-May/157538.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 594: Removing dead batteries from the standard library