On 3/24/2019 8:21 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > We'll be announcing those appointments as we go, so I'm happy to > report that I will be handling the BDFL-Delegate responsibilities for > the following PEPs: Where do we discuss these? If a delegate has a provisional view, it might help focus discussion if that were known. > * PEP 499: Binding "-m" executed modules under their module name as > well as `__main__` My brief response: +1 unless there is a good reason not. There have been multiple double module problems reported on python-list and likely stackoverflow. And would there be any impact on circular imports? -- Terry Jan Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4