On Fri, 22 Mar 2019 16:11:45 +0200 Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka at gmail.com> wrote: > 22.03.19 13:33, Antoine Pitrou пише: > > On Fri, 22 Mar 2019 13:27:08 +0200 > > Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Making it always 32 bits would be compatibility breaking change. > >> Currently array('u') represents the wchar_t string, and many API on > >> Windows require it. > > > > The question is: why would you use a array.array() with a Windows C API? > > I do not. But maybe it is used. And changing the width of the 'u' code > would break such use case. Right. But changing the width is not what I had in mind. Just keep it identical until we finally decide to remove it. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4