Hi, I agree to make PendingDeprecationWarning an alias to DeprecationWarning. I never liked "PendingDeprecationWarning" name, it's way too long to type :-D Le ven. 22 mars 2019 à 03:45, Inada Naoki <songofacandy at gmail.com> a écrit : > I want to stop using PendingDeprecationWarning for new deprecation. I'm fine with that. > More aggressively, I want to remove PendingDeprecationWarning class, > and `PendingDeprecationWarning = DeprecationWarning` for backward > compatibility. I'm not sure that I understand well. Do you want to remove the PendingDeprecationWarning builtin symbol, or just make it an alias to DeprecationWarning. I'm fine with "PendingDeprecationWarning = DeprecationWarning". IMHO your email title is misleading. You don't want to *remove* PendingDeprecationWarning, you only want to make it an alias to DeprecationWarning, right? In term of backward compatibility, it's very different :-) Victor
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4