On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 15:10:40 +0100 Stéphane Wirtel <stephane at wirtel.be> wrote: > totally agree with you but this function is deprecated (2002) since 2.3, > with a simle comment about a security issue. "Deprecated" doesn't mean anything here. It's just a mention in the documentation. It doesn't produce actual warnings when used. And for good reason: there are valid use cases. > so, from today to 3.9+ there are approximatively 43 months -> 3,5 years. > I think it's enough in term of time for the big projects to improve > their code. Please explain how the "improvement" would look like. What is the intended replacement for the use case I have explained, and how does it improve on the statu quo? And if there is an easy replacement, then how about re-implementing mktemp() using that replacement, instead of removing it? Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4