Ah yes, good point, I forgot about this because IIRC it's not supported in Python 2.7, so it's not a particularly common idiom in polyglot library code. Obviously any new methods would be Python 3-only, so there's no benefit to adding them. Best, Paul On 2/14/19 1:12 PM, Alexander Belopolsky wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 9:07 AM Paul Ganssle <paul at ganssle.io > <mailto:paul at ganssle.io>> wrote: > > I don't think it's totally unreasonable to have other total_X() > methods, where X would be days, hours, minutes and microseconds > > I do. I was against adding the total_seconds() method to begin with > because the same effect can be achieved with > > delta / timedelta(seconds=1) > > this is easily generalized to > > delta / timedelta(X=1) > > where X can be days, hours, minutes or microseconds. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20190214/05ccf9fe/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20190214/05ccf9fe/attachment.sig>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4