On Feb 13, 2019, at 15:07, Victor Stinner <vstinner at redhat.com> wrote: > > Le mer. 13 févr. 2019 à 21:26, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> a écrit : >> I don’t think this should be conflated with PEP 394. IMHO, 3.10 is just fine. Python 4 should be reserved for some future mythical GIL-less interpreter or other major API breaking change. It might never happen. > > My point is that changing the major version from 3 to 4 *will* break > things. We have to prepare the community to support such change. Perhaps. I just don’t think Python 4 is anything but distant vaporware. There’s a cost to freaking everyone out that Python 4 is coming and will be as disruptive as Python 3. Calling Python 3.9+1 Python 4 feeds into that FUD for no reason that I can tell except for an aversion to two digit minor version numbers. -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20190213/7ea6b6b3/attachment.sig>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4