A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2019-February/156284.html below:

[Python-Dev] Another update for PEP 394 -- The "python" Command on Unix-Like Systems

[Python-Dev] Another update for PEP 394 -- The "python" Command on Unix-Like Systems [Python-Dev] Another update for PEP 394 -- The "python" Command on Unix-Like SystemsVictor Stinner vstinner at redhat.com
Wed Feb 13 18:07:35 EST 2019
Le mer. 13 févr. 2019 à 21:26, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> a écrit :
> I don’t think this should be conflated with PEP 394.  IMHO, 3.10 is just fine.  Python 4 should be reserved for some future mythical GIL-less interpreter or other major API breaking change.  It might never happen.

My point is that changing the major version from 3 to 4 *will* break
things. We have to prepare the community to support such change.

For example, advice to replace "if major_version == 3:  ... else: ..."
with "if major_version >= 3:  ... else: ...".

Victor
-- 
Night gathers, and now my watch begins. It shall not end until my death.
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4