A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2019-February/156272.html below:

[Python-Dev] Another update for PEP 394 -- The "python" Command on Unix-Like Systems

[Python-Dev] Another update for PEP 394 -- The "python" Command on Unix-Like Systems [Python-Dev] Another update for PEP 394 -- The "python" Command on Unix-Like SystemsPetr Viktorin encukou at gmail.com
Wed Feb 13 10:24:48 EST 2019
PEP 394 says:

 > This recommendation will be periodically reviewed over the next few
 > years, and updated when the core development team judges it
 > appropriate. As a point of reference, regular maintenance releases
 > for the Python 2.7 series will continue until at least 2020.

I think it's time for another review.
I'm especially worried about the implication of these:

- If the `python` command is installed, it should invoke the same
   version of Python as the `python2` command
- scripts that are deliberately written to be source compatible
   with both Python 2.x and 3.x [...] may continue to use `python` on
   their shebang line.

So, to support scripts that adhere to the recommendation, Python 2
needs to be installed :(


Please see this PR for details and a suggested change: 
https://github.com/python/peps/pull/893
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4