On 2019-02-06, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > For maximum synergy between these initiatives and the resulting APIs, > it is better if things are done in the open ;-) Hi Antoine, It would be good if we could have some feedback from alternative Python implementations as well. I suspect they might want to support these APIs. Doing zero-copy or sharing memory areas could be a challenge with a compacting GC, for example. In that case, having something in the API that tells the VM that a certain chunk of memory cannot move would be helpful. Regards, Neil
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4