A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2019-February/156240.html below:

[Python-Dev] About the future of multi-process Python

[Python-Dev] About the future of multi-process Python [Python-Dev] About the future of multi-process PythonAntoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Wed Feb 6 12:06:06 EST 2019
Hello,

For the record there are number of initiatives currently to boost the
usefulness and efficiency of multi-process computation in Python.

One of them is PEP 574 (zero-copy pickling with out-of-band buffers),
which I'm working on.

Another is Pierre Glaser's work on allowing pickling of dynamic
functions and classes with the C-accelerated _pickle module (rather than
the slow pure Python implementation):
https://bugs.python.org/issue35900
https://bugs.python.org/issue35911

Another is Davin's work on shared memory managers.

There are also emerging standards like Apache Arrow that provide a
shared, runtime-agnostic, compute-friendly representation for in-memory
tabular data, and third-party frameworks like Dask which are
potentially able to work on top of that and expose nice end-user APIs.

For maximum synergy between these initiatives and the resulting APIs,
it is better if things are done in the open ;-)

Regards

Antoine.


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4