RetroSearch Browse

Tue Feb 5 11:44:20 EST 2019 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2019-February/156221.html

Hi David,

I cannot comment on the PR, but since the functionality is
asyncio-specific, I would suggest moving it to a dedicate
`asyncio.testing` module, or something similar, rather than leaving it
in `unittest` proper.

Regards

Antoine.

On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 07:05:05 -0500
David Shawley <daveshawley at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone, I added a PR to add a sub-class of unittest.TestCase that makes it possible to write async test methods.  I wrote this a few months ago and it is waiting on core review.  Is there a core dev that can take up this review?  I would love to have this functionality in the core.
> 
> Lukasz - should we add this to Python 3.8 or is it too late for feature additions?
> 
> BPO link: https://bugs.python.org/issue32972 <https://bugs.python.org/issue32972>
> Github PR: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/10296 <https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/10296>
> 
> cheers, dave.
> --
> "State and behavior. State and behavior. If it doesn’t bundle state and behavior in a sensible way, it should not be an object, and there should not be a class that produces it." eevee
> 
> 

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2019-February/156221.html below:

[Python-Dev] bpo-32972: Add unittest.AsyncioTestCase review (for 3.8?)